Technology & Marketing Law Blog
2020–2026
1,333 posts
2026 128
October 2026
- It’s Hard to Win a Schedule A Case Without Filing the “Schedule A”–Speedy Simulator v. Schedule A Defendants
- Spam-Filtered Email Service Unwinds a $13M Default Judgment–Imagination Products v. Omont
- City Government Can Use Facebook’s Anti-Bot Tool–Jalisi v. Poway
- Alex Berenson’s Deplatforming Lawsuit Fails in the Second Circuit–Berenson v. Gottlieb
- Four Justices, One Mega-Publisher, and a Supreme Court Copyright Debacle (Guest Blog Post)
- Call for Papers/Participation, Internet Law Works-in-Progress Conference, SCU, March 6, 2027
- Marketing a “California Ethos” Doesn’t Support a California Publicity Rights Lawsuit–Boyden v. Hyundai
- Should Police Wipe a Criminal’s Cellphone Before Returning It?–U.S. v. Stathas
- Some New Data on Age Authentication Balk Rates
- Washington Supreme Court Dismisses Meta Pixels Case–Baker v. Seattle Children’s Hospital
- My Reddit AMA on the Law of Web Scraping
- Judge Barker (E.D. Tex.) Disassembles Two SAD Scheme Cases
September 2026
- Sedlik v. Von Drachenberg: The Right Way to Evaluate Wrongfulness (Guest Blog Post)
- The Fifth Circuit Does Fifth Circuit Things in Copyright Embedding Case–Emmerich v. Particle
- Snap Wants to be a State Actor??–Kansas v. Snap
- Op-Ed: Meta’s $5 Billion Deal with the State AGs to Take Down its Rivals
- Sedlik v. Von Drachenberg: All About That Intrinsic Test? (Guest Blog Post)
- Court Wipes Out SAD Scheme Default Judgment Due to Improper Email Service–Deckers v. Litfun
- When is a Man’s Penis Size a “Matter of Legitimate Public Concern”?–Kalil v. Kalil
- Another Abusive “Yelp Law” Lawsuit Fails–Scott v. Ulta
- Uber Guests Aren’t Bound By Uber’s TOS–Walker v. Uber
- After $6M and 17 Years Fighting the Record Labels’ Copyright Lawfare, the Court Awards Vimeo $16k in Costs–Capitol Records v. Vimeo
- TWEET and the Bird Logo Apparently Enter the Public Domain, But X Maintains Its Grip on the TWITTER Mark (For Now)–X v. Project Bluebird
- SAD Scheme Plaintiff Must Pay $40k to Defendant–Guangzhou Tinpod v. Schedule A Defendants
- Courts Still Can’t Let Go of the Possibility that Individual Prices are Copyrightable–Rapaport v. Nivoda
August 2026
- New York Judge Shuts Down a SAD Scheme TRO Request–CJB Global v. Schedule A Defendants
- Collaborators Using the ‘Instagram Collabs’ Feature May Forego a Section 230 Defense–Winer v. Mohammed
- Lawyer’s Fee Agreement Gagging Client Reviews Is Illegal–LS Carlson Law v. Sedgwick
- A 512(f) Case Survived a Motion to Dismiss. Guess What Happened Next–Channel 781 v. WCAC
- Grok’s TOS Formation Failed–Skaggs v. X.ai
- Every SAD Scheme Opinion Is Weird In Its Own Way–Cai v. Chaozhoushi Yitong Dianzi Shangwu Youxiangongsi
- LinkedIn’s Insight Tag Creates Legal Entanglements–Doe v. LinkedIn
- It’s Hard for Parodic Products to Tarnish Famous Trademarks–Bad Spaniels v. Jack Daniel’s
- 11th Circuit Rejects Keyword Advertising Liability–Deltona v. NOCO
- Ninth Circuit Lifts Restrictions on Agentic AI Accessing Amazon
July 2026
- CJEU Judgment on Geoblocking & Standards for Knowledge of Foreign Copyright Laws and Geoblocking Measures (Guest Blog Post)
- Another Court Shuts the Door on “Yelp Law” Drive-By Lawsuits–Arterberry v. Peet’s
- When You Reject Cookies, You Might Be Agreeing to Arbitration–Alba v. Harbor Freight
- Announcing the 2026 Edition of My Internet Law Casebook
- More Data on Online Age Authentication Balk Rates
- Appeals Court Shuts Down Bogus Private Enforcements of the ‘Yelp Law’–Moss v. GoDaddy
- Court Greenlights Jehovah’s Witnesses’ Unmasking of Online Critic–In re DMCA Subpoena to Cloudflare
- Federal Circuit Rebuffs SAD Scheme Plaintiff–Shenzhen Jisu v. Annex A Defendants
- Apple Defeats Liability for Not Scanning iCloud Items for CSAM, But the Judge Was Not Pleased–Amy v. Apple
- Court Upholds Instagram’s TOS–Feds for Freedom v. Meta
- eBay Defeats Contributory Copyright Claim–Lee v. SBS
- Large Roundup of Section 230 Rulings
- YouTube Exits Copyright Lawsuit Over YouTubers’ Videos–Barnes v. Sanchez
- Court Rebuffs Emojico’s SAD Scheme TRO Request
June 2026
- Cloudflare Defeats Lawsuit Over Nonconsensual Intimate Imagery (NCII) on Facebook–Doe v. Cloudflare
- Private Facebook Group Can Exclude Member–Khan v. ILONCA
- Scammy Ad Lawsuits Keep Vexing the Courts–Huckabee v. Meta
- Blogger Defeats Photographer’s Copyright Claim–Sokolskyfilm v. Messiah
- Section 230 Doesn’t Apply to Generative AI Enhancements to Ad Copy (But the Plaintiffs Lose Anyway)–Bouck and Suddeth v. Meta
- Google Search Isn’t a Common Carrier (duh)–Ohio v. Google
- Fifth Circuit Keeps Doing Fifth Circuit Things 📉–SEAT v. Paxton
- When Can Amazon Block an Agentic AI Service?–Amazon v. Perplexity (Guest Blog Post)
- Google Defeats “Negligent Digital Architecture” Claim–Starr™ v. Google
May 2026
- Seventh Circuit Limits Email Service to Chinese SAD Scheme Defendants–Kangol v. Hangzhou Silk
- How Often Do Consumers Balk at Doing Online Age Authentication?
- Ninth Circuit Panel Goes Out of Its Way to Question Section 230–Doe v. Meta
- Section 230 Ends Lawsuit by Twitter Premium Subscriber–Taddeo-Waite v. X
- New Book Chapter Tells the TSPA and TSF Origin Stories
- The YOLO Remand Shows Why the 9th Circuit Should Stop Carving Up Section 230–Bride v. Snap
- Raj Abhyanker’s Firm Ordered to Pay $90k+ for Ill-Advised Trademark Enforcement Lawsuit–LegalForce v. LawFirms
- WorldStarHipHop Gets Section 230 Dismissal–Eizenga v. MediaLab
- Court Rejects Lawsuit Over Online Criticisms of a Dater–D’Ambrosio v. Meta
- Blogger’s Photo Republication Isn’t Fair Use–Vedros v. Endless Mt. Labradors
- TOS Formation Fails, and So Does Section 230–Judge v. Academia
- Meta Defeats Two More Account Termination/Content Removal Lawsuits
- SAD Scheme Defendant Gets Damages Payout from the Bond–Bright Head v. Schedule A Defendants
- Judge Shopping & Schedule A (Guest Blog Post)
- 11th Circuit Rejects TOS Formation–Tejon v. Zeus
- SAD Scheme Plaintiff Gets Default Win But Blows the Layup on Damages–Shenzen Huajie v. Shenzen Leyibei
April 2026
- Plaintiffs Are Still Litigating–and Losing–Website Framing Cases (S&S v. Promo Hunt)
- We Still Don’t Know the Second Circuit’s Position on Embedding and Copyright Infringement–Richardson v. Townsquare
- Tenth Circuit Broadens CFAA ‘Loss’ Beyond Technological Harm–Moxie v. Nielsen (Guest Blog Post)
- Court Enjoins Another Arkansas Segregate-and-Suppress Law–NetChoice v. Griffin
- Section 230 Helps Discord Defeat “Defective Design” Claims Regarding Sexual Predation–Jane Doe v. Discord
- The Federal Government Used Jawboning to Censor ICE Transparency Initiatives–Rosado v. Bondi
- U.S. Supreme Court Narrows Secondary Liability in Copyright Law–Cox v. Sony (Guest Blog Post)
- Remember When the Ninth Circuit Rejected Classpass’ TOS Formation? About That…–Blackburn v. Classpass
- The Cox Shock: A Tectonic Shift or Just a Tremor? (Guest Blog Post)
- With Opinions Like This, Congress Doesn’t Need to Repeal Section 230–Massachusetts v. Meta
- Will Lower Courts Find Ways Around Cox v. Sony? You Betcha
- Prof. Goldstein on Cox v. Sony (Excerpt from His Treatise)
- Do DMCA Takedown Notices Need to Expressly Refer to the Lack of Fair Use?–Take-Two v. PlayerAuctions
March 2026
- Comments on the Jury Verdict in the Los Angeles Social Media Addiction Bellwether Trial (Expanded/Updated)
- Quick Comments on the SCOTUS Cox v. Sony Ruling
- Does 512(f) Apply Differently to Counternotices Compared to Takedown Notices?
- What Does a Hologram Trademark Signify When the Hologram Isn’t There?–Upper Deck v. Pixels
- Section 230’s Application to Account Terminations, CSAM, and More
- A Religious Organization is Suing its Critics, and the Weapon of Choice is Copyright—RRT v. Cheryl Bawtinheimer (Guest Blog Post)
- Another Reminder: Lawsuits Over Competitive Keyword Ads Are Stupid
- Photobucket’s Attempted TOS Amendment Mostly Fails–Pierce v. Photobucket
- SAD Scheme Copyright Plaintiff Must Compensate Defendants–Shenzhen Langmi v. Schedule A Defendants
- A “But They’re ‘Counterfeiters’!” Argument Doesn’t Clinch a SAD Scheme TRO–Emojico v. Schedule A Defendants
- Ninth Circuit Allows TOS Amendment by Email–Ireland-Gordy v. Tile
- Catching Up on Some Social Media Addiction Rulings
- Free-Trial Commercial Database Defeats Publicity Rights Claim–LaFleur v. Yardi
February 2026
- If You Don’t Keep Good Records, Don’t Be Surprised if Your TOS Formation Fails in Court–White v. PayPal
- Section 230 Preempts Lawsuit Over Unwanted Gmail Spam–Dor v. Google
- A SAD Scheme Plaintiff Unsuccessfully Plays an IP Privilege Card–Price v. Schedule A Defendants
- New Article Alert: “SAD Scheme Standing Orders”
- A First-Hand Look at the Messy Underbelly of DMCA 512(c) Takedowns
- Pre-Publication Content Moderation Can Disqualify Services from the DMCA 512(c) Safe Harbor–McGucken v. ShutterStock
- Fair Use Blocks Privacy-Motivated Copyright Lawsuit–MCM v. Perry
- California’s Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Assists a Private Right of Action–Shah v. MyFitnessPal
- Google Search Isn’t a Common Carrier–Richards v. Google
- The Sixth Circuit Wades Into Online TOS Formation (and Leaves Me More Confused Than Ever)–Dahdah v. LowerMyBills
- How Does the Initial Interest Confusion Doctrine Improve Trademark Analyses?–Dassault v. Childress
- This Week in the “DMCA Eating Copyright Law”: Cordova v. Huneault (Guest Blog Post)
- Reflections on Section 230’s Past, Present, and Future on Its 30th Anniversary
- Another Confusing Internet Jurisdiction Opinion (This Time, from the 1st Circuit)–Stokinger v. Armslist
January 2026
- A Volcanic Opinion in the Fifth Circuit Destabilizes International Copyright Law—Vetter v. Resnik (Guest Blog Post)
- The Ninth Circuit Wrecked Internet Jurisdiction Law…And For What?–Briskin v. Shopify
- Relitigating hiQ Labs and Scraping Through the Lens of DMCA 1201 Anti-Circumvention (Guest Blog Post)
- It Takes a Lot for 512(f) Claims to Survive a Motion to Dismiss–Cordova v. Huneault
- TikTok Isn’t a U.S. State Actor (So Far)–Brooks v. TikTok
- Salesforce Still Can’t Avoid Tertiary Liability FOSTA Claims–GG v. Salesforce
- Ninth Circuit Deletes RNC’s Lawsuit Over Gmail’s Spam Filter–RNC v. Google
- Greer Burns Law Firm Sanctioned for “Willfully Abusive” and “Egregious” SAD Scheme Judge-Shopping
- What Does It Mean to Make a Voice Call in a Post-Telephone World?–Howard v. RNC
- AT&T Blocks T-Mobile’s Data Portability Efforts (Guest Blog Post)
- Copyright Takedown Notices Don’t Require Services to Find and Remove Other Identical Copies–Athos v. YouTube
- DMCA 512(c) Safe Harbor Applies to Embedding–Harrington v. Pinterest
- 2025 Internet Law Year-in-Review
- A Massive Roundup of Section 230 Decisions
2025 183
December 2025
- Schedule A: Ten Notable Developments in 2025 (Guest Blog Post)
- Too Many Courts Are Letting States Take Wrecking Balls to the Internet (Roundup)
- Texas Judge Enjoins App Store Authentication Law–CCIA and SEAT v. Paxton
- Google Can Assert a DMCA 512(d) Defense–Cengage v. Google (Catch-Up Post)
- Appeals Court Accepts That the “Water” Emoji Can Be Slang for Methamphetamine–U.S. v. Reed
- District Court Again Rejects Plaintiffs’ Attempts to Manufacture Common Law Notice-and-Takedown Duties–Bogard v. TikTok
- Courts Enjoin Internet Censorship Laws in Louisana and Arkansas
- OnlyFans Defeats “Chatter Scam” Claim–N.Z. v. Fenix
- Post-Mortem of a Misguided Logo Trademark Lawsuit–LegalForce v. Internet Brands
- Second Circuit Rejects Email Service on Chinese Defendants in Baby Shark SAD Scheme Case
- Is Blogging a “Recreational Activity”?–Sander v. Westchester Reform Temple
- Are Robots.txt Instructions Legally Binding?–Ziff Davis v. OpenAI
- COVID Jawboning Lawsuit Dismissed (For Now)–Dressen v. Flaherty
- Court Authorizes Unmasking Subpoena in Copyright Case–In re DMCA Subpoena to GoDaddy
- Visa Isn’t Liable for Underenforcing Its No-Surcharge Rule–Williams v. Visa
- Copyright Lawsuits Over Embedding Are Still a Thing
- Extortion Claims Against Ripoff Report Can Proceed–Selker v. Xcentric
- 11th Circuit Sidesteps the SAD Scheme’s Problems–Ain Jeem v. Schedule A
- Another Shill Article Tries to Normalize the SAD Scheme
November 2025
- YouTuber Loses Account Suspension Case Again–Hall v. YouTube
- Challenge to Maryland’s “Kid Code” Survives Motion to Dismiss–NetChoice v. Brown
- Court Sanctions Plaintiff’s Lawyer for Unverified Claims That the Defendant Was Hiding–Guangzhou Youlan Technology Co. Ltd. v. Onbrill World
- Twitter’s TOS Formation Upheld–Taddeo-Waite v. X
- Third Circuit Rejects a Meta Pixels Case–Cole v. Quest Diagnostics
- Emoji Evidence Errors Don’t Undo a Murder Conviction–People v. Harmon
- Terminated User Loses Lawsuit Against Facebook–Hunt v. Meta
- The Initial Interest Confusion Doctrine Refuses to Die
- ‘Initial Interest Confusion’ Is More of a Vibe Than a Credible Legal Doctrine–Penn State v. Vintage Brand
- Colorado’s Mandatory Social Media “Warning Labels” Are Unconstitutional–NetChoice v. Weiser
- Addiction Lawsuit Against TikTok Can Proceed in Nevada–TikTok v. Nevada District Court
- Court Dismisses Discrimination Claims from Facebook User Who Didn’t Get Wanted (?) Ads–Shah v. Woodbury
- Using a Meme in Your Advertising? Clear the Publicity Rights–FJerry v. Oasis Energy
- Another Facebook Account Termination, Another Failed Lawsuit–Karam v. Meta
- Copyright Claims Over Content Syndication Sniping Can Proceed–Next Impulse v. NewsBreak
October 2025
- SAD Scheme Cases Are a Cesspool of IP Owner Overreaches–Nike v. Quanzhou Yiyi Shoe Industry
- Copyright Takedown Notices May Be Affecting Your Washing Machine Options–Ningbo Yituo v. GoPlus
- Section 230 Applies to Scammy Ads–Glazer v. Facebook
- Section 230 Preempts Predator Access Claims Against Apple, Snap, and Verizon–Joan Doe v. Snap
- Online TOS Formation Cases Make My Head Hurt
- If You Could Cast a Spell to Create a New Law School Course, What Would You Create?
- My Testimony Against Mandatory Online Age Authentication
- District of New Jersey Adopts SAD Scheme Standing Order
- Patient’s Negative Review of Her Dentist Wasn’t a “Matter of Public Concern”–J&D Dental v. Hou
- The Wrap Taxonomy Vexes the Judge in the LinkedIn Insight Tag Cases
- Court “Sanctions” SAD Scheme Judge Shopping—Crimpit v. Schedule A Defendants
September 2025
- Court Fetishizes Facebook’s TOS Statement That It Takes “Appropriate” Content Moderation Actions–Calise v. Meta
- Chicago-Kent SAD Scheme Symposium TOMORROW
- When Does Content Moderation Trigger Direct Copyright Infringement?–LoopNet v. CREXi (Catch-up Post)
- 512(f) Claim Sent to Trial (Which Didn’t Happen)–Leszczynski v. Kitchen Cube
- Another TOS Formation Fails–Carruth v. Big Little Feelings
- 512(f) Doesn’t Support Preliminary Injunction–BViral v. TheSoul
- Amicus Brief Urges Seventh Circuit to Award Attorneys’ Fees in SAD Scheme Case–Louis Poulsen v. Lightzey
- Section 230 Applies to Surreptitiously Recorded Video–Does 1-9 v. Pornhub and xHamster
August 2025
- Court Rejects Initial Interest Confusion Claims for Competitive Keyword Ads–Regalo v. Aborder
- Ninth Circuit Dismisses “Session Replay” Lawsuit–Popa v. Microsoft
- The Ninth Circuit’s Flood of TOS Formation Cases
- Court Greenlights Politician’s Censorship of Social Media Comments–Fox v. Faison
- Court Rejects Schedule A Claims Against Sellers of Compatible Parts/Accessories (Cross-Post)
- ACPA Doesn’t Apply to Vanity URLs–Athene Annuity v. Athene Group
- Google Search Isn’t a “Common Carrier” (DUH)–Ohio v. Google
- Internet Access Providers Aren’t Bound by DMCA Unmasking Subpoenas–In re Cox
- In 512(f), the “F” Stands for “Futility”–Shaffer v. Kavarnos
- Google and Roblox Defeat Videogame Addiction Lawsuit–Courtright v. Epic Games
- Judge Kness: the SAD Scheme “Should No Longer Be Perpetuated in Its Present Form”–Eicher Motors v. Schedule A Defendants
- What’s the Difference Between Copyright Takedown Notices and Spam?–Michael Grecco v. Fandom
- Lawsuits Over Competitive Keyword Advertising Are Still Stupid–NRRM v. American Dream Auto Protect
- SAD Scheme Lawyers Sanctioned for Judge-Shopping–Dongguan Deego v. Schedule A
- University of Wisconsin-Madison Censored Animal-Rights Activist on Instagram and Facebook–Krasno v. UWM
- The Ninth Circuit Finds Two New Ways to Undermine Section 230–Doe v. Twitter
- Comments on Setting Patent Fees Based on Their Value
- Does Anyone Still Care About NFTs? (Yuga Labs, LLC v. Ripps) — Guest Blog Post
July 2025
- Announcing the 2025 Edition of My Internet Law Casebook
- Apply To Become My Colleague! Santa Clara Law Is Hiring Tenure-Line Faculty
- Social Media Services Aren’t Liable for Buffalo Mass-Shooting–Patterson v. Meta
- Trump Lost the Trump Tapes Ruling, But Could He Still Prevail? (Guest Blog Post)
- Trump’s Lawsuit Over The Trump Tapes is Dismissed (Trump v. Simon & Schuster) — Guest Blog Post
- The Second Circuit Is Done With Meta Pixels VPPA Cases–Hughes v. NFL
- Rounding Up Three Recent Section 230 Decisions
- Social Media Addiction Lawsuit Proceeds Against TikTok and Instagram–Nazario v. Bytedance
- Judge Ranjan Cracks Down on SAD Scheme Cases
- Read the Published Version of My Paper Against Mandatory Online Age Authentication
- Facebook and Twitter Defeat Account Termination Lawsuit–Castronuova v. Meta
- Catching Up on the Bogus “Yelp Law” Litigation Campaign–Tao v. Uniqlo
- Analyzing the Lululemon v. Costco Dupe Suit (Guest Blog Post)
June 2025
- Prof. Goldman’s Statement on the Supreme Court’s Demolition of the Internet in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton
- YouTube Again Defeats FOSTA Lawsuit–In re YouTube Trafficking Litigation
- Reddit Defeats Lawsuit Over WallStreetBets Subreddit–Rogozinski v. Reddit
- Section 230 (Still) Applies to Contract Breach Claim–NJCCC v. McAleer
- After 20 Years, I Turned Off Google AdSense for My Websites
- Court Rejects Trespass to Chattels Claim Over Placing Cookies–Doe v. Tenet
- Clickwrap Formed Even When a Consumer Has Limited Time to Act–Washington v. Flixbus
- Reddit Challenges Anthropic’s Scraping to Create Generative AI Models (Guest Blog Post)
- A Review of the NYT v. Microsoft AI-Copyright Ruling (Guest Blog Post)
- A Takedown of the Take It Down Act
- Amazon Isn’t Liable for Merchant’s Display of Bogus Contact Info–Hillman v. Amazon
- What is a “Social Media Platform”?–NetChoice v. Uthmeier
May 2025
- NJ Supreme Court Blesses Lawyers’ Competitive Keyword Ads (With a Baffling Caveat)
- Because the SAD Scheme Disregards Due Process, Errors Inevitably Ensue–Modlily v. Funlingo
- ChatGPT Defeats Defamation Lawsuit Over Hallucination–Walters v. OpenAI
- A Roundup of Recent Section 230 Decisions Involving Sex Abuse or CSAM
- Court Dismisses Lawsuit Over Online Review of a Chicago Dater–D’Ambrosio v. Rajala
- YouTuber Loses Lawsuit Over Account Suspension–Hall v. YouTube
- Addiction Lawsuit Against Character AI Can Proceed–Garcia v. Character Technologies
- Photos in a Similar Style Aren’t Copyright-Infringing–Woodland v. Lil Nas X
- Video Game Addiction Case Mostly Sent to Arbitration–Orellana v. Roblox (Catch-up Post)
- Court Upholds a Browsewrap (Because It Was Really a Sign-in-Wrap)–Hoar v. Hotmart
- School Board Official Censored Constituent by Blocking Access to Their Social Media Account–Garnier v. O’Connor-Ratcliff
- Amazon Merchant Takedown Notice Attack Spills Over to Court–GM Photo v. Focus Camera
- Price Lists Aren’t Copyrightable–Rapaport v. Nivoda
- Meta Pixels Case Dismissed by Second Circuit–Solomon v. Triller
- Leaky TOS Formation = No TOS Formation–Snyder v. G6
- More Account Termination Cases Fail in Court
April 2025
- Hinge Defeats Account Termination Case–Bangalore v. Match
- Section 230 and the First Amendment Curtail An Online Videogame Addiction Lawsuit–Angelilli v. Activision
- Another TOS Formation Failure in the 9th Circuit–Godun v. JustAnswer
- Ninth Circuit Takes a Wrecking Ball to Internet Personal Jurisdiction Law–Briskin v. Shopify
- Court Permanently Enjoins Ohio’s Segregate-and-Suppress/Parental Consent Law–NetChoice v. Yost
- WeChat Defeats Account Termination Lawsuit–Sun v. WeChat
- TikTok Defeats Lawsuit Over User’s Suicide–Nasca v. Bytedance
- Arkansas’ Social Media Safety Act Permanently Enjoined—NetChoice v. Griffin
- Why I Emphatically Oppose Online Age Verification Mandates
- Rounding Up Some Recent Copyright Decisions
- SAD Scheme-Style Case Falls Apart When the Defendant Appears in Court—King Spider v. Pandabuy
- Facebook Defeats Armslist’s Account Termination Lawsuit–Armslist v. Facebook
- Courts’ Expectations for TOS Formation Keep Going Up—Lee v. Plex
- Viral DRM Awarded Damages for Its 512(f) Claims, But At What Cost?
- Roblox Faces Potentially Unlimited Copyright Liability—Robinson v. Binello
- Blogiversary: What Will This Blog Look Like in 10 Years? (Part 10 of 10)
- Section 230 Applies to Consumer Reporting Agencies (But Only Sometimes)–Foley v. IRBsearch
March 2025
- Rounding Up Recent Copyright and AI Rulings
- Are You Ready for MAGA to Weaponize Anti-Doxxing Statutes?–Watts v. Daily Kos
- First Amendment Doesn’t Apply to Descriptions of Content Moderation Practices–Bride v. Snap
- It’s Never the RICO–Loomer v. Zuckerberg
- Blogiversary: How Information Consumption Habits Have Changed Over the Years (Part 9 of 10)
- Blogiversary: Guest Bloggers of the Technology & Marketing Law Blog (Part 8 of 10)
- Amazon Isn’t Liable for Marketplace Items That Make False Claims–Planet Green v. Amazon
- Purchase First, TOS Presentation Second = TOS Fail–Seneca v. Homeaglow
- California AG Abandons Key Parts of California’s Mandatory Editorial Transparency Law (AB 587)–X v. Bonta
- California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code (AADC) Is Completely Unconstitutional (Multiple Ways)–NetChoice v. Bonta
- Ethan Ackerman Reflects on the Blogiversary (Part 7 of 10)
- Jess Miers Reflects on the Blogiversary (Part 6 of 10)
- Section 230 Protects Facebook’s Decision to Cut Off Sketchy App’s API Access–Six4Three v. Facebook
- Fourth Circuit Upholds TOS Formation Despite a Bad Call-to-Action, But Strikes Down Unilateral Amendment Clauses
- Verizon and Its Cloud Vendor Must Face Lawsuit for Reporting “CSAM” That Wasn’t – Lawshe v. Verizon (Guest Blog Post)
- Another Lawsuit Over Online Content Restrictions Fails–Qian v. YouTube
- Section 230 Still Applies to Email Forwarding–Motekaitis v. USI
- Serial Copyright Plaintiff Lacks Standing to Enforce Third-Party Copyrights–Viral DRM v 7News
- Section 230 Doesn’t Apply to “Refer-a-Friend” Text Message–Jensen v. Capital One
- Court Overturns a Bad Jury Verdict Against Scraping–Ryanair v Booking (Guest Blog Post)
- The Ninth Circuit Has a Lot to Say About Online Contract Formation (Much of It Confusing)–Chabolla v. ClassPass
February 2025
- Another Conflict Between Privacy Laws and Age Authentication–Murphy v. Confirm ID
- Court Rejects an Attempt to Create a Common-Law Notice-and-Takedown Scheme–Bogard v. TikTok
- Blogiversary: How the Blog Helps Readers (Part 5 of 10)
- Blogiversary: Readers’ Favorite Topics, Posts, and Memes (Part 4 of 10)
- TikTok Defeats Copyright Lawsuit Over Users’ Uploads–Waterman v. TikTok (Catch-Up Post)
- Big YouTube Channel Gets TRO Against Being Targeted by DMCA Copyright Takedown Notices–Invisible Narratives v. Next Level Apps
- Blogiversary: Who Reads the Blog, and Why? (Part 3 of 10)
- Blogiversary: How Has the Blog Changed Over the Past 20 Years? (Part 2 of 10)
- Ninth Circuit Says Section 230 Preempts “Defective Design” Claims–Doe v. Grindr
- Facebook Compelled to Comply With Washington Political Ad Transparency Law (Catch-Up Post)–State v. Meta
- Recapping Three Social Media Addiction Opinions from Fall (Catch-Up Post)
- Copyright Owner Prevails in Lawsuit Over Form Contracts–Equine Legal v. Fireline Farms
- “Volitional Conduct” Doctrine Helps DistroKid Defeat Copyright Infringement Claim–White v. DistroKid
- The Competition Between Temu and Shein Moves Into a Courtroom–Whaleco v. Shein
- Some Comments on Today’s Thomson Reuters v. Ross Copyright Ruling
- District Court Blocks More of Texas’ Segregate-and-Suppress Law (HB 18)–SEAT v. Paxton
- Celebrating the Blog’s 20th Blogiversary (Part 1 of 10)
- Section 230 Immunizes OnlyFans for User-Uploaded Video (Again)–Doe v. Fenix
- Section 230 Still Works in the Fourth Circuit (For Now)–M.P. v. Meta
- Section 230 Protects Newspaper’s Removal of User Comments–Affleck v. Harvard Crimson
January 2025
- Court Upholds Google’s Ad TOS Amendment to Add an Arbitration Clause–In re Google Digital Advertising Antitrust Litigation
- Glassdoor Partially Fixes a Bad Section 230 Ruling–Nicholas Services v. Glassdoor
- Copyright Owners Are Still Suing Over Embedding
- Supreme Court Upholds TikTok Ban, and Domestic and Foreign Censors Rejoice–TikTok v. Garland
- Initial Comments on the Supreme Court’s TikTok Ban Opinion–TikTok v. Garland
- Another N.D. Ill. Judge Balks at SAD Scheme Joinder–Zaful v. Schedule A Defendants
- Comments on the Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton SCOTUS Oral Arguments on Mandatory Online Age “Verification”
- 512(c) Helps Vimeo Defeat the Record Labels. It Only Took 15 Years–Capitol v. Vimeo
- Catching Up on the Heavyweight Scraping Battle Between X and Bright Data (Guest Blog Post)
- Court Denies Preliminary Injunction Against Minnesota’s Anti-“Deepfakes” Law–Kohls v. Ellison
- Copyright Battles Over City Council Videos
- 2024 Internet Law Year-in-Review
- California’s “Protecting Our Kids from Social Media Addiction Act” Is Partially Unconstitutional…But Other Parts Are Green-Lighted–NetChoice v. Bonta
2024 196
December 2024
- The “Winning Isn’t Normal” Copyright Enforcement Campaign Is More “Abusive” Than “Winning”–Bell v. Kiffin
- The Fifth Circuit’s Campaign to Undermine Section 230 Is Making Progress–AB v. Salesforce
- Court Declares Parts of Twitter’s TOS Unconscionable–Gerber v. Twitter
- Thumbs-Up Emoji Formed Binding Sales Contract in Canada–Achter v. South West Terminal
- Facebook Defeats User’s TOS Breach Claim–Lloyd v. Facebook
- Omegle Defeats Lawsuit Over User’s “Capping”–MH v. Omegle
- Uber’s TOS Formation Upheld Again–Wu v. Uber
- How Many Times Must the Courts Say “No” to This Guy?–Fyk v. Facebook
- Does IP Law Protect Influencers’ Aesthetics?–Gifford v. Sheil (Guest Blog Post)
- Unfair and Impolite Tweets Aren’t Defamatory–Flynn v. Wilson
- Suspended Twitter User Loses Lawsuit Due to Section 230–Ryan v. X
- Bleg: Please Help Me Prepare for the Blog’s 20th Blogiversary
- DC Circuit Says the TikTok Ban Is Censorship, But Upholds It Anyway–TikTok v. Garland
November 2024
- Amazon Must Defend “Yelp Law” Claim–Ramos v. Amazon
- Attempt to Weaponize Section 230(c)(2)(B) Fails on Ripeness Grounds–Zuckerman v. Facebook
- Judge Rejects SAD Scheme Joinder–Toyota v. Schedule A Defendants
- Snap’s TOS Withstands an Unconscionability Challenge–Howard v. Snap
- High School Can Discipline Student for Undisclosed Use of Generative AI–Harris v. Adams
- Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) Treated as General Partnership for Liability Purposes–Samuels v. Lido DAO
- Section 230 Applies to Gamer’s Complaints About Griefing–Haymore v. Amazon
- Courts Are Echoing The Third Circuit’s Repeal of Section 230–Huckabee v. Meta
- Another Judge Balks at SAD Scheme Joinder–Xie v. Annex A
- When a Copyright Owner Gets Only a $1,000 Judgment in Federal Court, They’re the Real Losers–McDermott v. KMC
- Call for Papers/Participation: the revived Internet Law Works-in-Progress Conference, SCU, March 8, 2025
- Section 230 Immunizes OnlyFans for User-Uploaded Video–Doe v. Fenix
- Can EdTech Vendors Force Parents into Arbitration?–Shanahan v. IXL
- Will Judges Become More Skeptical of Joinder in SAD Scheme Cases?–Dongguan Juyuan v. Schedule A
- Another “Sign-in-Wrap” TOS Formation Process Fails–Morrison v. Yippee
- CA Anti-SLAPP Law Applies to #MeToo Instagram Post–Nelson v. Bridgers
October 2024
- Virtual Casino’s “Sign-in-Wrap” Formation Fails–Kuhk v. Playstudio
- Ticketmaster’s Attempt to Game Arbitration Services Fails–Heckman v. Live Nation
- What Is It With “Kennedy” Politicians Bringing Weak Lawsuits Against Facebook?–Baldwin-Kennedy v. Meta
- Section 230 Defeats Underage User’s Lawsuit Against Grindr–Doll v. Pelphrey
- A 27-Month Check-In on the Copyright Claims Board (CCB) (Guest Blog Post)
- Ninth Circuit Tells Trademark Owners to Stop Suing Over Competitive Keyword Ads–Lerner & Rowe v. Brown Engstrand
- The VPPA May Be a Dinosaur Statute, But It’s Very Much Alive in the Second Circuit–Salazar v. NBA
- Expert Witness Used Generative AI to Prepare His Report. It Didn’t Go Well–In re Weber
- Court Revives Indiana AG’s False Advertising Case Against TikTok–State v. TikTok
- Internet Access Providers Face Contributory Copyright Liability for Subscribers’ Infringements–UMG v. Grande
- Second Circuit Tells Trademark Owners to Stop Suing Over Competitive Keyword Advertising–1-800 Contacts v. Warby Parker
- Court Enjoins California’s Anti-“Political Deepfakes” Law (AB 2839) Because It’s Unconstitutional Censorship–Kohls v. Bonta
- Catching Up on Two Keyword Ad Cases
- eBay Isn’t Liable for Merchants’ Sales of Items That Violate Environmental Laws–US v. eBay
- Pixel Case Against Google “Jumps the Shark”–Doe I v. Google (Catch Up Post)
September 2024
- Consumers Who Don’t Read “Clickwraps” Are Still Bound By Them–Toth v. Everly Well
- Tattoo Artist Wins Copyright Claim, But Gets Zero Damages–Alexander v. Take Two
- Angi Can’t Dismiss Lawsuit Over Failed Vendor Authentication–Everyspace v. Encor
- Five Decisions Illustrate How Section 230 Is Fading Fast
- Allegations of a Bribe-Driven Facebook-OnlyFans Conspiracy Unsurprisingly Fall Apart in Court–Dangaard v. Instagram
- Internet Law Professors Submit a SCOTUS Amicus Brief on Online Age Authentication–Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton
- Augmented Reality Filters May Violate Privacy Law–Hartman v. Meta
- Facebook Defeats Lawsuit Over Allegedly Pornographic Ads–Reaud v. Facebook
- Record Label Sends Bogus Takedown Notice, Defeats 512(f) Claim Anyway–White v. UMG
- Trump’s Tweet Infringed the Song “Electric Avenue”–Grant v. Trump
- Court Enjoins the Utah “Minor Protection in Social Media Act”–NetChoice v. Reyes
- Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Is Breaking Internet Law Faster Than I Can Blog It
- Second Circuit Says More About the “Reasonable Internet User” Standard for TOS Formation–Edmundson v. Klarna (Catchup Post)
- Comment on France’s Prosecution of Telegram Founder Pavel Durov
- Ninth Circuit Enjoins Much of California’s Mandatory Editorial Transparency Law (AB 587)–X v. Bonta
- Another Texas Online Censorship Law Partially Enjoined–CCIA v. Paxton
August 2024
- Bonkers Opinion Repeals Section 230 In the Third Circuit–Anderson v. TikTok
- AWS Can’t Shake BIPA Lawsuit for Providing Services to NBA 2K–Mayhall v. Amazon
- When It Comes to Section 230, the Ninth Circuit is a Chaos Agent–Estate of Bride v. YOLO
- Glassdoor Denied Section 230 Immunity for Reviews from Non-Employees–Nicholas Air v. Glassdoor
- Copyright Lawsuit Over Cameo Videos Fails Due to Fair Use (on a Motion to Dismiss)–Santos v. Kimmel
- Ninth Circuit Strikes Down Key Part of the CA Age-Appropriate Design Code (the Rest is TBD)–NetChoice v. Bonta
- Eleventh Circuit Gives the Slip to the Duct-Taped Banana Copyright Appeel–Morford v. Cattelan
- A Report from the White House’s Inaugural “Creator Economy Conference” (Guest Blog Post)
- Announcing the 2024 Edition of My Internet Law Casebook
- Section 230 Helps Substack Defeat a Defamation Claim–Smith v. Substack
- Section 230 Doesn’t Preempt Utah’s Minor Protection in Social Media Act–NetChoice v. Reyes
- Ryanair v. Booking CFAA Trial Ends with Strangest Possible Outcome (Guest Blog Post)
- Court Blows Up Gmail’s Section 230 Protection, But Allegations of Biased Spam Filtering Still Fail–Republican National Committee v. Google
July 2024
- Government Agencies Can’t Use Dumb Word Filters to Screen Social Media Comments–PETA v. Tabak
- Google Can Terminate Account Based on CSAM Allegations–Baker v. Google
- Section 230 Preempts FOSTA Claim–Doe v. WebGroup Czech Republic
- Everything You Wanted to Know About the Moody v. NetChoice Supreme Court Opinion
- Competitor Isn’t Responsible for Google Knowledge Panel’s Contents–International Star Registry v. RGIFTS
- Announcing the Seventh Edition of Advertising & Marketing Law Casebook by Tushnet & Goldman
- Deleting an Instagram Post Was Evidence-Tampering–Webb v. U.S.
- Section 230 Preempts Two More Harassment Lawsuits
- Eggplant Emoji 🍆 Means What You Think It Means–State v. Farley
- SAD Scheme Leads to Another Massively Disproportionate Asset Freeze–Powell v. Schedule A
- It’s Hard to Bind Former Subscribers to TOS Amendments–Brooks v. WarnerMedia
- What Happened to Gonzalez v. Google After the SCOTUS Decision?
- Facebook Isn’t Subject to the ADA–Lloyd v. Facebook
- DMCA 512(c) Helps Redbubble Defeats Copyright Lawsuit–Wallshoppe v. Redbubble
- What Should Happen When a Schoolteacher Posts Hateful Memes to TikTok?–MacRae v. Mattos
- Justice Thomas Hates on Section 230. Again.–Doe v. Snap
- Mississippi’s Age-Authentication Law Declared Unconstitutional–NetChoice v. Fitch
- Statement on the Supreme Court’s Ruling in Moody v. NetChoice
June 2024
- Indiana’s Anti-Online Porn Law “Is Not Close” to Constitutional–Free Speech Coalition v. Rokita
- Heightened Constitutional Scrutiny is Not Required for Content-Based Trademark Registration Laws That Are Viewpoint-Neutral—Vidal v. Elster (Guest Blog Post)
- Plaintiffs Lack Standing to Sue Over Government Jawboning When Their Evidence is Based on Vibes–Murthy v. Missouri
- Coursera Wins a TOS Formation Battle, But With Heavy Losses–Ghazizadeh v. Coursera
- This Case Keeps Wrecking Internet Law–Enigma v. Malwarebytes
- ‘Scruff’ App Qualifies for Section 230 Immunity–J.R. v. Mancino
- Reusing Social Media Photos for Ads? Be Careful!–Khachatryan v. 1 Hotel
- Court Revives Lawsuit Against Facebook Over Scammy Crypto Ads–Forrest v. Meta
- Facebook Defeats BIPA Face-Scanning Lawsuit–Zellmer v. Meta
- Will Biometric Privacy Laws Undermine the Fight Against CSAM?–Martell v. X
- What Should Photo Repositories Do About Blackface Photos?–Thompson v. ShutterStock
- Court Dismisses School Districts’ Lawsuits Over Social Media “Addiction”–In re Social Media Cases
- Courts Are Rejecting Attempts to Weaponize Laws That Protect Consumer Reviews
- Meme Law Alert! Meme Use In Political Ad Isn’t Fair Use–Griner v. King
- MA Supreme Court Blesses Uber’s TOS Clickthrough Formation–Good v. Uber
- Instagram Defeats Lawsuit Claiming It Was a “Breeding Ground” for Sex Traffickers–Doe v. Backpage
- TIL: “Texas Tamale” Is an Enforceable Trademark–Texas Tamale v. CPUSA2
- Misidentified Person Loses Defamation Claim Against Tabloid–Bloom v. A360
- Ninth Circuit Does More Damage to Section 230–Calise v. Meta
- Facebook Makes Some Progress Against a Scraper–Meta v. Voyager (Guest Blog Post)
- YouTube Isn’t Liable for User Uploads of Animal Abuse Videos–Lady Freethinker v. YouTube
- Section 230 Applies to YouTube and Google Search Results–Montano v. Washington Department of Health
May 2024
- Section 230 Applies to Publication of Court Documents–Medina v. Microsoft
- Ninth Circuit Rejects Another Lawsuit Over Account Termination–Mercola v. YouTube
- NC Supreme Court Blesses Unilateral TOS Amendment to Add an Arbitration Clause–Canteen v. Charlotte Metro CU
- Section 230 Doesn’t Apply to “Editorializing” About Third-Party Content–Marvin v. Lanctot
- Defamation Claim Proceeds Against YouTuber’s Denialism–Robertson v. Upchurch
- A Peek Into the Long Tail of Facebook’s Litigation Docket
- X Corp. v. Bright Data is the Decision We’ve Been Waiting For (Guest Blog Post)
- Supreme Court Fixes One Problem with the Copyright Statute of Limitations, But Punts Another — Warner Chappell Music v. Nealy (Guest Blog Post)
- Elon Musk’s Gifts to Web Scrapers (Guest Blog Post)
- Section 230 Preempts Product Design Claims–Lama v. Meta
- Supreme Court Addresses When Government Employees’ Social Media Accounts are State Action (Lindke & Garnier)
- Plaintiffs Make Some Progress in 512(f) Cases
- The 7th Circuit’s Section 230 Jurisprudence’s Impact on FOSTA Cases
April 2024
- Trump’s Retweets Are Criminal Contempt of a Gag Order–People v. Trump
- Misjoinder Dooms SAD Scheme Patent Case–Wang v. Schedule A Defendants
- Ninth Circuit Upholds “Sign-in-Wrap”–Keebaugh v. Warner Bros.
- Why Generative AI is Doomed
- Videogame Maker Has Implied License to Depict Copyrighted Tattoos–Hayden v. 2K
- Zuckerberg Avoids Personal Liability for Social Media “Addiction”–In re Social Media Addiction
- Jawboning Defendants Are 6-for-6 in the Ninth Circuit–Hart v. Facebook
- Section 230 Applies to Tweeted Links to Defamatory Content–Coomer v. Donald J. Trump for President
- They Should Have Used a Dickwrap–Weeks v. Interactive Life Forms
- The Supreme Court Didn’t Change Secondary Copyright Liability Standards in the Taamneh Ruling—In re Frontier
- SAVE THE DATE: Internet Law Works-in-Progress Conference, SCU, March 8, 2025
- Section 230 Preempts Clean Air Act Lawsuit Over “Defeat Device” Apps—U.S. v. EZ Lynk
- Roblox Must Defend Illegal Gambling Claims–Colvin v. Roblox
March 2024
- YouTube Defeats Claim Over Content Removal/Demonetization–Haocheng v. YouTube
- TOS Formation Isn’t Hard to Do Right…Is It?–Tejon v. Zeus
- Ninth Circuit Does More Ninth Circuit Things in its Latest Section 230 Ruling–Diep v. Apple
- New Essay Comparing “Due Process” Approaches in the DMCA and DSA
- Court Says Twitter Misused Litigation to Punish Defendants for Their Speech–X v. CCDH
- Section 230 Applies to Claims Over Hijacked Accounts (Except Maybe Verified Accounts)–Wozniak v. YouTube
- Judge Hammers SEC for Lying to Get an Ex Parte TRO–SEC v. Digital Licensing
- Buffalo’s Mass-Murder Leads to a Wrong Section 230 Decision–Jones v. Mean
- The Ninth Circuit’s Broad (and Wrong) Standards for Conversion–Taylor v. Google (Guest Blog Post)
- Tubi’s TOS Formation Fails–Campos v. Tubi
- Twitter Narrows, But Doesn’t Completely Avoid, a Dangerous Copyright Lawsuit–Concord Music v. X
- Fifth Circuit Once Again Disregards Supreme Court Precedent and Mangles Section 230–Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton
- “Ringless Voicemail” Vendor Wins Section 230 Defense Against FTC–US v. Stratics Networks
- The SAD Scheme as an Institutional Failure
- Section 230 Doesn’t Apply to Sending Non-Consensual Pornography by Postal Mail–Doe v. Spencer
- Print-on-Demand Service Defeats Fish Illustrator’s Copyright Claim–Tomelleri v. Sunfrog
- Print-on-Demand Services Face More Legal Woes–Canvasfish v. Pixels
- “Assuming Good Faith Online” Essay Published
February 2024
- WIPIP 2024 Highlights
- Facebook Drops Anti-Scraping Lawsuit Against Bright Data (Guest Blog Post)
- Court Preliminarily Enjoins Ohio’s Law Requiring Parental Consent for Children’s Social Media Usage–NetChoice v. Yost
- Comments on the NetChoice/Moody/Paxton SCOTUS Oral Arguments
- Reaction Videos Are Fair Use–Thiccc Boy v. Swindelles
- Internet Access Providers Can Be Contributorily Liable for Subscribers’ Infringements–Sony Music v. Cox
- Snapchat Isn’t Liable for Offline Sexual Abuse–VV v. Meta
- Judge Reconsiders SAD Scheme Ruling Against Online Marketplaces–Squishmallows v. Alibaba
- Another Court Finds an “Enforceable Browsewrap.” MAKE IT STOP–Hawkins v. CMG
- Ninth Circuit Enforces a “Browsewrap” (That Was Actually a Clickthrough)–Patrick v. Running Warehouse
- The European Union’s Digital Services Act: In Force from This Saturday, February 17, 2024, Including for U.S. Intermediaries (Guest Blog Post)
- Boat Rental Marketplace Defeats Lawsuit Over Offline Boating Accident–In re Chaves
- Fourth Circuit Issues a Bummer Fair Use Ruling–Philpot v. IJR
- Retweeting as Copyright Infringement–Prepared Food Photos v. Chicken Joe’s
- YouTube Still Isn’t a State Actor–Albertson v. Google
- Online Marketplace Defeats Lawsuit Over Murder–Roland v. Letgo
- Think You Understand Online Trespass to Chattels Law? Think Again–In re Meta Healthcare Pixels
January 2024
- Section 230 Protects Zillow for Publishing Property Information–Choudhuri v. Specialized Loan
- Atari’s Lawsuit Against a Print-on-Demand Service Fizzles Out–Atari v. Printify
- Plaintiffs Tried to Plead Around Section 230. It Didn’t Work–Ziencik v. Snap
- 2023 Quick Links: Leftovers
- Game On! Bright Data Scores Major Victory in Web-Scraping Dispute with Meta (Guest Blog Post)
- Courts Still Have No Clue How to Determine Who Owns Social Media Accounts–JLM v. Gutman
- Two More Cases Compel Arbitration for Dubious Online Contracts (Guest Blog Post)
- 2023 Emoji Law Year-in-Review
- N.D. Cal. Judge Pushes Back on Copyright SAD Scheme Cases–Viral DRM v. YouTube Schedule A Defendants
- Facebook Defeats Lawsuit Claiming It “Discriminated” Against Muslim & Palestinian Content–Elansari v. Facebook
- 2023 Internet Law Year-in-Review
- Cloned-and-Revised Legal Documents Aren’t Copyrightable–UIRC v. William Blair
- 2023 Quick Links: Social Media
- Facebook Defeats Lawsuit Over Its January 6 Explanation–Mahoney v. Meta
- 2023 Quick Links: Censorship
- Web Page Framing Isn’t Trespass to Chattels–Best Carpet Values v. Google
- Ninth Circuit Confusion About Moderators and Section 230–Quinteros v. Innogames
- Court Enjoins Ohio’s Law Requiring Parental Approval for Children’s Social Media Accounts–NetChoice v. Yost
- Judge Goes Rogue and Rejects Snap’s Section 230 Defense for [Reasons]–Neville v. Snap
- Internal Search Results Aren’t Trademark Infringing–PEM v. Peninsula
- Judge Rejects a Motion With the “Exploding Head” Emoji–DePietro v. Levitt
- A Judge Enumerates a SAD Scheme Plaintiff’s Multiple Abuses, But Still Won’t Award Sanctions–Jiangsu Huari Webbing Leather v. Schedule A Defendants
2023 181
December 2023
- Why Online Marketplaces Don’t Do More to Combat the SAD Scheme–Squishmallows v. Alibaba
- Grindr Defeats FOSTA Claim–Doe v. Grindr
- 2023 Quick Links: IP, Keyword Ads
- 2023 Quick Links: Section 230
- Many Fifth Circuit Judges Hope to Eviscerate Section 230–Doe v. Snap
- Twitter Defeats FOSTA Case Over CSAM–Doe v. Twitter
- Advertiser Can’t Force Facebook to Run Sex Product Ads–Strachan v. Facebook
- Should Copyright Preemption Moot Anti-Scraping TOS Terms? (Guest Blog Post)
- SAD Scheme Cases Are Always Troubling–Betty’s Best v. Schedule A Defendants 😠
- Hot Take on the Wavy Baby Decision (Guest Blog Post)
- Section 230 Helps Amazon Defeat False Advertising Lawsuit Over Printer Ink Cartridges–Planet Green v. Amazon
- Suspended Twitter User Loses Lawsuit Over Data Access–Thomas v. Twitter
- Plaintiffs Are Eager to Invoke the Texas Social Media Censorship Law, But Will They Have to Do So in California?
- My Amicus Brief in Moody v. NetChoice and NetChoice v. Paxton
- Judge Pushes Back on SAD Scheme Sealing Requests
- Roblox Sanctioned for SAD Scheme Abuse–Roblox v. Schedule A Defendants
- Amazon May Be Liable for Merchant’s Spycam–M.S. v. Amazon
- Section 230 Applies to Doxxing TikTok Video–Couture v. Noshirvan
- Anti-TikTok Political Stunts Fail in Montana and Indiana Courts
November 2023
- 512(f) Doesn’t Restrict Competitive Gaming of Search Results–Source Capital v. Barrett Financial
- Now Available: the Published Version of My SAD Scheme Article
- Evaluating the Constitutionality of Viewpoint-Neutral Trademark Registration Laws That Do Not Restrict Speech—Vidal v. Elster (Guest Blog Post)
- Facebook’s LLaMa Defeats Copyright Claims–Kadrey v. Meta
- Another Jawboning Case Fails in the 9th Circuit (But a TAFS Judge Doesn’t Like the Biden Administration)–Rogalinksi v. Meta
- Facebook Faces Contributory Trademark Liability for Marketplace Listings–Car-Freshner v. Meta
- YouTuber Loses Lawsuit Demanding $22/View–Ray v. Google
- Apple’s App Store Can Reject Unwanted Apps–Coronavirus Reporter v. Apple
- Ninth Circuit Revives Choreography Copyright Claims Over Fortnite Emotes–Hanagami v. Epic
- Some New Section 230 Memes
- Section 230 Applies to Nextdoor Consumer Reviews–Duffer v. Nextdoor
October 2023
- Section 230 Protects Gmail’s Spam Filter–RNC v. Google
- The DTSA Ex Parte Seizure Provision Was Always Bad Policy–Janssen v. Evenus
- Section 230 Once Again Applies to Claims Over Offline Sexual Abuse–Doe v. Grindr
- This Blog Has Jumped the Shark: I’m Covering a Copyright Opinion About a Tattoo of Tiger King’s Joe Exotic–Cramer v. Netflix
- Copyright Lawsuits Over Product Shots Are Still Stupid–SMS v. Pharmaaid
- Call for Participation: WIPIP, Santa Clara, Feb. 2-3, 2024
- Louisiana’s Age Authentication Mandate Avoids Constitutional Scrutiny Using a Legislative Drafting Trick–Free Speech Coalition v. LeBlanc
- Section 230 Applies to Employee’s Post on Government-Operated Internal Message Board–Montanino v. New York City Dep’t of Sanitation
- Think Kiwi Farms Is Legally Unassailable? Copyright Law Might Disagree–Greer v. Moon
- Comments on the Ruling Declaring California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code (AADC) Unconstitutional–NetChoice v. Bonta
- Does California’s Anti-Discrimination Law Ban Ad Targeting?–Liapes v. Facebook
- VRBO Qualifies for Section 230–Wiener v. Miller
- Laura Loomer Loses Litigation (Again)–Loomer v. Zuckerberg
- Photo Licensing Service Qualifies for DMCA 512(c) Safe Harbor–McGucken v. ShutterStock
- In a SAD Scheme Case, Court Rejects Injunction Over “Emoji” Trademark
September 2023
- SHOP SAFE Act Reintroduced, Because Some Congressmembers Really Want to Kill Online Marketplaces
- I Filed an Amicus Brief Against New York’s Editorial Transparency Law
- Q&A About Emoji Law
- Two Separate Courts Reiterate That Online Age Authentication Mandates Are Unconstitutional
- When Do Inbound Call Logs Show Consumer Confusion?–Adler v McNeil
- Sixth Circuit Dismisses Online Jawboning Case–Changizi v. DHHS
- Schedule A (SAD Scheme) Plaintiff Sanctioned for “Fraud on the Court”–Xped v. Respect the Look
- Facebook Can Reject Unwanted Ads–Newton v. Meta
- Anti-Vaxxer’s Lawsuit Over Channel Removal Fails–Mercola v. YouTube
August 2023
- Lawsuit Over Twitter Suspension Fails Again–Zhang v. Twitter
- Court Denies Injunction in Competitive Keyword Ad Lawsuit–Nursing CE Central v. Colibri
- Preemptive Challenge to California’s Mandatory Editorial Transparency Law Lacks Standing–Minds v. Bonta
- YouTube Still Isn’t a State Actor–RFK Jr. v. Google
- Web Scraping for Me, But Not for Thee (Guest Blog Post)
- My Comments to the USPTO About the SAD Scheme and Anticounterfeiting/Antipiracy Efforts
- Court Says No Human Author, No Copyright (but Human Authorship of GenAI Outputs Remains Uncertain) (Guest Blog Post)
- Court Doesn’t Expect YouTube to Moderate Content Perfectly–Newman v. Google
- Facebook Easily Defeats Lawsuit Over User Posts–Hicks v. Bradford
- Ninth Circuit Easily Dismisses Account Termination Case–King v. Facebook
- 512(f) Once Again Ensnared in an Employment Ownership Dispute–Shande v. Zoox
- LawTuber Loses Defamation Case–Broughty v. Bouzy
- Another Doctor Learns Why It’s Unwise to Sue Patients
- More Chaos in the Law of Online Contract Formation
- Instagram Account Termination Case Fails–Johnson v. Instagram
- Another LinkedIn Account Termination Case Fails–Gundogdu v. LinkedIn
- Announcing the 2023 Edition of My Internet Law Casebook
- How A Century-Old Insight of Photography Can Inform Legal Questions of AI-Generated Artwork (Guest Blog Post)
- Ninth Circuit Reaffirms the “Server Test” for Direct Infringement of the Public Display Right — Hunley v. Instagram, LLC (Guest Blog Post)
- Section 230 Immunizes Facebook’s “Design and Architecture” Choices–M.P. v. Meta
July 2023
- Copyright Owner Can Proceed with Vicarious Infringement Claim Against eBay–Okolita v. eBay
- Texan J6er’s Social Media Censorship Case Moved to California–Davis v. Facebook
- A Single Emoji Could Constitute Securities Fraud–In re Bed Bath & Beyond
- Chegg Is Likely to Prevail on Its Anti-Scraping Contracts Claim…But Doesn’t Get an Injunction–Chegg v. Doe (Guest Blog Post)
- Ninth Circuit Highlights the Messy Law of Contributory Trademark Infringement Online–YYGM v. RedBubble
- DC Circuit Upholds FOSTA’s Constitutionality (By Narrowing It)–Woodhull v. U.S.
- Amazon Can Freely End Book Reviewer’s Authoring Privileges–Haywood v. Amazon
- An E-Commerce Site Tried to Form Its TOS Three Different Ways. None of Them Worked–Chabolla v. ClassPass
- Contractual Control over Information Goods after ML Genius v. Google (Guest Blog Post)
- Trademark Extraterritoriality: Abitron v. Hetronic Doesn’t Go the Distance (Guest Blog Post)
- Armslist Defeats Lawsuits Over Illegal Gun Sales (Without Section 230’s Help)–Webber v. Armslist
- Court Finally Rejects “Discrimination” Lawsuit Against YouTube–Divino v. Google
- Reddit Defeats Lawsuit Over Removal of r/WallStreetBets Moderator’s Privileges–Rogozinski v. Reddit
- How Will the Digital Services Act (DSA) Affect the European Internet?
- Amazon Isn’t Liable for Selling Suicide “Kits”—McCarthy v. Amazon
- European IP Office Denies Trademark Registration for “I Love You” Emoji 🤟
- A Thumbs-Up Emoji Costs a Canadian Seller $82,000–South West Terminal v. Achter Land
June 2023
- Why I Oppose the California Journalism Protection Act (the Short Version)
- Revisiting Bananas, Duct Tape, Walls, & Copyright–Morford v. Cattelan
- Uh-Oh, the Ninth Circuit Is Messing Again With Its Roommates Ruling–Vargas v. Facebook
- It Turns Out You Can’t “Sue the CDA”–Fyk v. US
- California’s Proposed Fix to the Journalism Crisis Is Unconstitutional and Worse Than Socialism (Comments on the California Journalism Protection Act, CJPA)
- Resolving Conflicts Between Trademark and Free Speech Rights After Jack Daniel’s v. VIP Products (Guest Blog Post)
- U.S. Supreme Court Vindicates Photographer But Destabilizes Fair Use — Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (Guest Blog Post)
- Politician-Operated Social Media Accounts Raise Many Thorny Legal Issues
- The 9th Circuit Keeps Trying to Ruin Cybersecurity–Enigma v. Malwarebytes
- How Can AI Models Legally Obtain Training Data?–Doe 1 v. GitHub (Guest Blog Post)
- Of Course Section 230 Applies to Amazon Reviews–McCall v. Zotos
- Test Buys Don’t Create Personal Jurisdiction Over Amazon Merchant–Oceanside v. Instock
- Section 230 Ends Another Suspended Twitter User’s Lawsuit–Zhang v. Twitter
- Section 230 Doesn’t Apply to High Schoolers’ Online Bullying–Kutchinski v. Freeland Community School District
- Section 230 Immunizes Snap, Even if It’s “Inherently Dangerous”–L.W. v. Snap
- Google Isn’t Liable for Scam Ads–Ynfante v. Google
- Section 230 Once Again Immunizes Google’s Search Results–Metroka v. PA Law Enforcement
- Sad that Twitter Deplatformed Trump? Don’t Take It to Court–Rutenberg v. Twitter
May 2023
- Who Owns Social Media Accounts?–In re Bang Energy Drinks
- Class Certification Denied Over Rightsowners’ Demands for Content ID Access–Schneider v. YouTube
- Court Greenlights TikTok Content Moderators’ Lawsuit–Young v. ByteDance
- More Thoughts about the SCOTUS Twitter and Google Rulings
- Competitive Keyword Ad Lawsuit Fails…Despite 236 Potentially Confused Customers–Lerner & Rowe v. Brown Engstrand
- Ill-Advised Attempt to Blow Up the DMCA Online Safe Harbors Unsurprisingly Fails–Athos v. YouTube
- Roundup of Recent Section 230 Developments
- The Internet Survives SCOTUS Review (This Time)–Twitter v. Taamneh and Gonzalez v. Google
- Two Common but Disingenuous Phrases About Section 230
- “Twitter Files” Don’t Help Revive Jawboning Case–Hart v. Facebook
- More on Law Firms and Competitive Keyword Ads–Nicolet Law v. Bye, Goff
- Section 230 Immunizes Bing’s Search Results–White v. Microsoft
- Twitter Account Suspension Lawsuits Keep Failing–Hall v. Twitter
- Privacy Law Is Devouring Internet Law (and Other Doctrines)…To Everyone’s Detriment
- Another Jawboning Case Fails in the Ninth Circuit–Kennedy v. Warren
- DMCA 512(c) Safe Harbor Doesn’t Apply to Photo Embedding–Great Bowery v. Best Little Sites
- The Ninth Circuit’s FOSTA Jurisprudence Is Getting Clearer (and More Defense-Favorable)
April 2023
- Surprise! Another 512(f) Claim Fails–Bored Ape Yacht Club v. Ripps
- Minnesota’s Attempt to Copy California’s Constitutionally Defective Age Appropriate Design Code is an Utter Fail (Guest Blog Post)
- Amazon Screws Up Its TOS Amendments (Again)–Jackson v. Amazon
- Microsoft Can Terminate User Account for Allegedly Possessing CSAM. But What If It Made a Mistake?–Deutsch v. Microsoft
- Twitter Defeats Account Suspension Case–Craft v. Musk
- Prison Warden Says: ‘Lock The Emojis Up.’ Court Replies: ‘Free the Emojis’–Taliani v. Dortch
- New Article: “The United States’ Approach to ‘Platform’ Regulation”
- Do Mandatory Age Verification Laws Conflict with Biometric Privacy Laws?–Kuklinski v. Binance
- Service Provider to a Ponzi Scheme Operation Qualifies for Section 230–Wiand v. ATC Brokers
- Services Aren’t Liable for Ignoring the DMCA’s 512(g) Counternotification Procedures–Hopson v. Google
- The First Amendment Limits Trademark Rights, But How?–Jack Daniel’s v. Bad Spaniels (Guest Blog Post)
- You’re a Fool if You Think You Can Win a 512(f) Case–Security Police and Fire Professionals v. Maritas
March 2023
- Understanding the CCB’s First Two Final Determinations (Guest Blog Post–Part 3 of 3)
- After hiQ Labs, Is Scraping Public Data Legal? (Guest Blog Post)
- Copyright Claims Board (CCB) Default Notices (Guest Blog Post–Part 2 of 3)
- Copyright Claims Board (CCB) Opt-Outs – How’s That Going? (Guest Blog Post–Part 1 of 3)
- Venkat’s Blog Post Unjustly Removed from Google Search Results Due to EU RTBF Takedown
- Section 230 Protects Emailing an Article–Monge v. University of Pennsylvania
- Government Submissions to a Trusted Flagger Program Aren’t Unconstitutional Jawboning–O’Handley v. Weber
- Section 230 Protects BBB from Liability for Consumer Complaints–Amuze v. BBB
- YouTuber Owes Money to YouTube for Ill-Conceived Deplatforming Lawsuit–Daniels v. Alphabet
- My New Article on Abusive “Schedule A” IP Lawsuits Will Likely Leave You Angry
- YouTube Defeats Trademark Lawsuit–Lops v. YouTube
- Consumers Don’t Think Plant-Based “Milks” Are Cowmilk, But the FDA Wants More Disclosures Anyway
- Ripoff Report Gets a Pricey Lesson on Section 230–Selker v. Xcentric
- Form “Non-Disparagement” Clause Violated Consumer Review Fairness Act–State v. Ideal Horizon Benefits
February 2023
- Why I Think California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code (AADC) Is Unconstitutional
- Debrief on the Taamneh v. Twitter Oral Arguments
- Quick Debrief on the Gonzalez v. Google Oral Arguments
- Preparing for the Supreme Court’s Gonzalez v. Google Oral Arguments
- Musk’s Changes at Twitter Moot Lawsuit Over Naomi Wolf’s Deplatforming–Trump v. Twitter
- New York’s Mandatory Editorial Transparency Law Preliminarily Enjoined–Volokh v. James
- A Preliminary Analysis of Trump’s Copyright Lawsuit Over Interview Recordings (Trump v. Simon & Schuster) (Guest Blog Post)
- Snapchat Defeats Lawsuit Over User-to-User Harassment–Ziencik v. Snap
- Can Government Agencies Ban Scraping?–NAACP v. Kohn (Guest Blog Post)
- Domain Name Sniping Covered by Section 230–Scott Rigsby v. GoDaddy
- Section 230 Still Applies to User Reviews–Daniloff v. Google
January 2023
- University-Operated Twitter Account is a Limited Public Forum–Gilley v. Stabin
- What Does the “Water” Emoji Mean? Perhaps Not What You Think–US v Swanagan
- If You Ask Your Friend to Take Your Photo Using Your Camera, Who Owns the Copyright?–Shah v. NYP
- 2022 Internet Law Year-in-Review
- Section 230 Applies to NY Publicity Rights Claim–Ratermann v. Pierre Fabre
- Fourth Circuit’s 230 Meltdown Gives Plaintiffs False Hope–Divino v. Google
- “Stop the Steal” Rally Attendee’s Defamation Claim Fails–Chad Burmeister v. Saldich
- Section 230 Protects Services That Permit Anonymous Third-Party Posts–Bride v. Snap
- My Amicus Brief in Gonzalez v. Google
- Man Convicted for Asking for CSAM on Mom Blogs–US v. Moran
- What Consequences for High School Freshmen’s Racist Online Petition?–Plaintiff A v. Park Hill School District
- Facebook Defeats Lawsuit Over Account Suspension for a Voting Misinformation “Joke”–Hall v. Meta
- 2H 2022 Quick Links, Part 5 (Censorship & More)
- Twitter Defeats Account Suspension Lawsuit Again–Al-Ahmed v. Twitter
- 2H 2022 Quick Links, Part 4 (Section 230, Consumer Reviews)
- Section 230 Applies to Police Union’s Message Board–Desilet v. East Hartford Police Officers’ Association
- 2H 2022 Quick Links, Part 3 (Copyrights and More)
- 2H 2022 Quick Links, Part 2 (Trademarks)
2022 220
December 2022
- High School Students Can Be Disciplined for Racist Private Instagram Account–Chen v. Albany School District
- Conflicting Terms of Service Provisions Undermine Arbitration Clause–Suski v. Coinbase
- 2H 2022 Quick Links, Part 1 (Marketing, Privacy)
- My Trustcon 2022 Keynote Talk
- FitBit’s Contract Formation Upheld Despite Different Ways of Linking to the TOS—Houtchens v. Google (with Bonus Contracts Quick Links)
- Ninth Circuit Easily Rejects Another Jawboning Case–Huber v. Biden
- Rounding Up Some Recent Editorial Transparency Developments
- Does Possession of Memes Show Criminal Intent?–People v. Watts
- Section 230 Protects a User Sharing an Allegedly Defamatory Facebook Event–AH v. Labana
- Got a Selfie With a Celebrity? Think Twice Before Using It In Ads–50 Cent v. Kogan
- Another Copyright Owner Learns Why It’s Better to Send DMCA Takedown Notices Before Suing–BMG v. Likee
- Constituent Blocking on Twitter Is Censorship–Felts v. Vollmer
- Messaging App Isn’t Liable for an Offline Murder (Even Without Section 230)–Roland v. Letgo
- 9th Circuit Unceremoniously Dismisses Antitrust Lawsuit Against Google–Dreamstime v. Google
- Hello, You’ve Been Referred Here Because You’re Wrong About Web Scraping Laws (Guest Blog Post, Part 2 of 2)
- Prager’s Lawsuit Over Biased Content Moderation Decisively Fails Again (This Time, in State Court)–Prager v. YouTube
- As Everyone Expected Years Ago, hiQ’s CFAA Wins Don’t Mean It Can Freely Scrape–hiQ v. LinkedIn (Guest Blog Post, Part 1 of 2)
- 512(f) Plaintiff Must Pay $91k to the Defense–Digital Marketing v. McCandless
- Facebook Can’t Shake Lawsuit Over OnlyFans Bribery Allegations–Dangaard v. Meta
- Catching Up on Government Officials’ Censorship of Constituents on Social Media
November 2022
- Another Rough Copyright Ruling for Internet Access Providers–Bodyguard v. RCN
- New Paper: “Assuming Good Faith Online”
- Yet More Evidence That Keyword Advertising Lawsuits Are Stupid–Porta-Fab v. Allied Modular
- Snap and Airbnb Aren’t Liable for Tragic Shooting–Jackson v. Airbnb
- Court Again Rejects Lawsuit Over YouTube’s Allegedly Discriminatory Content Moderation–Divino v. YouTube
- A Hospital Mailed a Patient’s Confidential Diagnosis to a Rando. You’ll Never Guess What Happened Next–ZD v. Community Health
- “Liking” a Facebook Post Isn’t Defamatory–Gallagher v. MaternityWise
- How Copyright Law Fosters Anti-Competitive Behavior, Part Infinity–Bayam v. ID Tech
- A 5 Month Check-In on the Copyright Claims Board (CCB)
- Review of the “Pepsi, Where’s My Jet?” Netflix Documentary
- Another Tough People Search Ruling–Spindler v. Seamless
- Ninth Circuit Easily Rejects Jawboning Claims Against YouTube–Doe v. Google
- My Testimony to the Colombian Constitutional Court Regarding Online Account Terminations and Content Removals
- Twitter Wins Another Account Termination Case–Yuksel v. Twitter
- Fourth Circuit Takes a Wrecking Ball to Zeran and Section 230–Henderson v. Public Data
October 2022
- Does the CFAA Help Airlines Control Their Distribution Channels?–RyanAir v. Booking (Guest Blog Post)
- Section 230 Protects TikTok for “Blackout Challenge” Death, Despite the Algorithms–Anderson v. TikTok
- Defendants Get Important FOSTA Win in 9th Circuit–Doe v. Reddit
- My New Article Drops a Truth Bomb on Zauderer and Censorial Efforts to Mandate Editorial Transparency
- Memes as Judicial Opinions–Courthouse News Service v. Forman
- If the Word “Emoji” is a Protectable Trademark, What Happens Next?–Emoji GmbH v. Schedule A Defendants
- Facebook’s Website Isn’t Governed by the ADA–Lloyd v. Facebook
- More Evidence that FOSTA Benefited No One
- A Million-Dollar Thumbs-Up Emoji?–Lightstone v. Zinntex
- Section 230 Applies to Sellers’ Listings on Auto Auction Service–Cohen v. Copart
- Facebook Defeats Lawsuit Over Its Fact-Checking Explanations–Stossel v. Meta
- First Amendment Protects Videogame’s Depiction of Tractor’s Trade Dress–Saber v. Oovee
- Court Says “You May NOT Amend Your TOS by Posting New Terms to Your Site”–International Markets v. Thayer
- Uber Defeats Driver’s Wrongful Death Lawsuit–Drammeh v. Uber
- Jury Awards Damages to Tattoo Artist for Video-Game Depiction–Alexander v. WWE 2K (Guest Blog Post)
- Anti-Circumvention Takedowns Aren’t Covered by 512(f)–Yout v. RIAA
- Muslim Loses Case Against Facebook Over Discriminatory Content Moderation–Elansari v. Meta
- When Do Defendants Have Access to Copyrighted Works Posted to the Internet?–Cooley v. Target Corp.
September 2022
- Another Example of How “Notice and Explanations” Requirements are a Liability Trap–Shared v. Facebook
- Photo Licensing Service Qualifies for DMCA Online Safe Harbor–Steinmetz v. ShutterStock
- A 3 Month Check-In on the Copyright Claims Board (CCB)
- The 5th Circuit Puts the 1st Amendment in a Blender & Whips Up a Terrible #MAGA Kool-Aid–NetChoice v. Paxton
- Comments on Adobe’s 2022 Emoji Usage Trends Survey
- Five Ways That the California Age-Appropriate Design Code (AADC/AB 2273) Is Radical Policy
- Some Memes About California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code (AB 2273)
- Reminder: the First Amendment Governs Content Moderation by the Government–PETA v. Banks
- Amending Your TOS? Better Use a Clickthrough Process, Not Email Notice–Alkutkar v. Bumble
- Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute False Advertising (Huh?)–LoanStreet v. Troia
- Section 230 Protect Apple’s App Store from Claims Over Cryptocurrency Theft–Diep v. Apple
- An Interview Regarding AB 2273/the California Age-Appropriate Design Code (AADC)
- Section 230 Doesn’t Protect App Stores That Sell Virtual Chips for Casino Apps–In re Apple App Store
- Fortnite Emotes Don’t Infringe Dance Choreography–Hanagami v. Epic
- Using a CDN May Contribute to Finding Personal Jurisdiction–R18 v. ThisAV
August 2022
- My “Summer” 2022 Activities
- Another Tough Ruling for People Search Databases–Camacho v. Control Group Media
- Court Dissolves hiQ’s Injunction Against LinkedIn–hiQ v. LinkedIn
- My Comments to the CPPA Regarding its Initial CPRA Proposed Regulations
- Snap’s TOS Fails (Uh Oh)–Doffing v. Facebook
- Op-Ed: The Plan to Blow Up the Internet, Ostensibly to Protect Kids Online (Regarding AB 2273)
- California Anti-SLAPP Law Doesn’t Protect Negative Patient Review of Doctor–Premier Brain & Spine v. Cudia
- Publicity Rights Claim Isn’t Preempted by Section 230–Albert v. Tinder
- 11th Circuit UPHOLDS a 512(f) Plaintiff Win on Appeal–Alper Automotive v. Day to Day Imports
- Wrapping Up the “Lessons from the First Internet Ages” Project (New Content Alert!)
- Facebook Defeats Jawboning Lawsuit Over COVID Misinformation Removal–Rogalinski v. Meta
- HuffPost Contributor Isn’t an “Agent,” So Their Content Qualifies for Section 230–KGS v. Huffington Post
- Retweets ≠ Endorsements (As a Matter of Law)–Flynn v. CNN
- Police Officer’s Racist Memes on a Personal Facebook Page Address “Matters of Public Concern”–Hernandez v. Phoenix
- Announcing the Sixth Edition of Advertising & Marketing Law: Cases & Materials by Tushnet & Goldman
- A Short Explainer of Why California’s Social Media Addiction Bill (AB 2408) Is Terrible
- A Short Explainer of Why California’s Mandatory Transparency Bill (AB 587) Is Terrible
- A Short Explainer of How California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Bill (AB2273) Would Break the Internet
- Lawyer’s Agreement to Online Terms if Investigating a Claim May Bind a Client
- School Can Discipline Student for Impersonating Teacher Online, Even if Other Students Added the Worst Content–Kutchinski v. Freeland School District
- Who Owns a Disputed Social Media Account? – JLM v. Gutman
- More Evidence of the CFAA Post-Van Buren/hiQ Jurisprudential Anarchy (Guest Blog Post)
- A Court Calls Out Congress & the DOJ for Not Clarifying the ADA’s Application to Online Retailers–Martinez v. Cot’n Wash
- Is the California Legislature Addicted to Performative Election-Year Stunts That Threaten the Internet? (Comments on AB2408)
July 2022
- Quick Links from the Past Year, Part 8 (Editorial Transparency)
- Ninth Circuit: Elected Officials Violated the First Amendment by Blocking Constituents on Social Media–Garnier v. O’Connor-Ratcliff
- Trademark Owner Fucks Around With Keyword Ad Case & Finds Out–Las Vegas Skydiving v. Groupon
- The Ninth Circuit Reaffirms the Discovery Rule for the Copyright Act’s Statute of Limitations — Starz v. MGM (Guest Blog Post)
- Probationer Restricted from Using “Gang Symbols” on “Social Media”–In re JT
- Another Account Suspension Case Yeeted–Rangel v. Dorsey
- Omegle Denied Section 230 Dismissal–AM v. Omegle
- When Will Courts Admit Rap Videos/Lyrics Posted to Social Media as Evidence?–US v. Wiley
- A First Look at Copyright Claims Board (CCB) Filings
- Dropbox’s TOS Amendment Fails (And If This Opinion Stands, Yours Will Too)–Sifuentes v. Dropbox
- Section 230 Doesn’t Create a Cause of Action–Goodman v. Sharp
- Announcing the 2022 Edition of My Internet Law Casebook
- Quick Links from the Past Year, Part 7 (Section 230)
- Snapchat Isn’t Liable for a Teacher’s Sexual Predation–Doe v. Snap
- Sixth Circuit: Government Official Can Freely Censor Constituents at his Public Facebook Page–Lindke v. Freed
- Court Quashes 512(h) Subpoena on First Amendment Grounds–In re 512(h) Subpoena to Twitter
- Third Circuit Declares Copyright Independence for Fireworks Systems–Pyrotechnics v. XFX
- Quick Links from the Past Year, Part 6 (Defamation & Much More)
June 2022
- 1-800 Contacts Loses YET ANOTHER Trademark Lawsuit Over Competitive Keyword Ads–1-800 Contacts v. Warby Parker
- Another Court Says Section 230 Applies to Retweeting–Holmok v. Burke
- Will California Eliminate Anonymous Web Browsing? (Comments on CA AB 2273, The Age-Appropriate Design Code Act)
- Will California Clone-and-Revise Some Terrible Ideas from Florida/Texas’ Social Media Censorship Laws? (Analysis of CA AB587)
- Quick Links from the Past Year, Part 5 (Free Speech)
- Quick Links from the Past Year, Part 4 (The Algorithms; Facebook)
- Content Moderators’ Lawsuit Over Traumatic Work Fails Again–Aguilo v. Cognizant
- Anti-Cyberstalking Statute Must Be Read Narrowly to Keep It Constitutional–U.S. v. Yung
- Quantifying the Media’s Section 230 Misreporting in 2020
- Facebook Moderator Defeats Defamation Lawsuit Over Termination Explanation–Margolies v. Rudolph
- Quick Links from the Past Year, Part 3 (Trademarks)
- Quick Links from the Past Year, Part 2 (Copyright)
- “Private” Facebook Groups Aren’t Legally “Private”–Davis v. HDR
- Can Facebook Stop Data Snarfers?–Meta v. BrandTotal
- Quick Links From the Past Year, Part 1 (CCPA and Privacy)
- The Copyright Claims Board Is Opening Next Week. Are You Excited?
- Uber Isn’t Liable for Rapes Committed By Fake Drivers–Doe 1 v. Uber
- Can Tattoos Infringe Copyrights, and If So, What Happens Then?–Sedlik v. Kat Von D
- Supreme Court Restores Injunction Against Texas HB 20!–NetChoice v. Paxton
May 2022
- A Pop Quiz on TOS Formation–Wilson v. Triller
- Too Rusty For Krusty–Nickelodeon v. Rusty Krab Restaurant (Guest Blog Post)
- Section 230 Helps Craigslist Defeat Sex Trafficking Case–LH v. Marriott
- Section 230 Helps Salesforce Defeat Sex Trafficking Lawsuit–GG v. Salesforce
- Is Google’s Search Engine a “Common Carrier”? (Seriously???)–Ohio ex rel Yost v. Google
- Big Ruling for Free Speech: Most of Florida’s Social Media Censorship Law (SB 7072) Remains Enjoined–NetChoice v. Attorney General
- Rounding Up the Supreme Court Briefs in NetChoice v. Paxton, the Challenge to Texas HB20’s Social Media Censorship Law
- Twitter Defeats Another Account Suspension Lawsuit–Al-Ahmed v Twitter
- Another Failed Lawsuit Over Trump’s Deplatforming–Rutenberg v. Twitter
- My SCOTUS Amicus Brief on Texas HB20’s Unconstitutional Transparency Requirements
- Three More Yearbook/People Database Cases Signal Trouble for Defendants
- If TOS Formation Fails, Bad Legal Outcomes Are Likely to Follow–Doe v. Roblox
- Messaging Apps Raise Tricky E-Discovery Issues (Guest Blog Post)
- Section 230 Protects Retweeting–Banaian v. Bascom
- Minnesota Wants to Ban Under-18s From User-Generated Content Services
- Court Explains How Smileys Are “Prone to Multiple Interpretations”–In re State
- COVID Skeptics’ Anti-Jawboning Lawsuit Fails–Changizi v. Department of HHS
- COVID Skeptic Loses Lawsuit Over Account Terminations–Hart v. Facebook
- Twitter Defeats Trump’s Deplatforming Lawsuit–Trump v. Twitter
- My Comments on the California Consumer Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) Rulemaking
- Section 512(c) Protects Pinterest Despite Its Algorithms–Davis v. Pinterest
- Facebook Can’t Shake Publicity Rights Claim–Hepp v. Facebook
- Once Again, LinkedIn Can’t Use CFAA To Stop Unwanted Scraping–hiQ v. LinkedIn
- Constitutional Challenge to FOSTA Fails–Woodhull v. US
April 2022
- Account Suspension Lawsuit Against Twitter Survives Motion to Dismiss–Berenson v. Twitter
- Section 230 Helps Facebook Defeat Lawsuit Over Scam Ads–Calise v. Meta
- Another Failed Lawsuit Over Facebook’s Content Removals–Brock v. Zuckerberg
- Catching Up on a FOSTA Case–ML v. Craigslist
- Catching Up on the Challenge to Texas’ Social Media Censorship Law–NetChoice v. Paxton
- Facebook Loses Jurisdictional Ruling in Texas Sex Trafficking Lawsuit–Facebook v. Doe
- Facebook Defeats Lawsuit Over Its Failure to Explain an Account Termination–King v. Facebook
- Section 230 Doesn’t Protect Quote-Tweeting–US Dominion v. Byrne
- Poorly Executed “Sign-in-Wrap” Contract Formation Process Fails–Berman v. Freedom Financial
- Does Snapchat’s Speed Filter Cause Car Accidents?–Lemmon v. Snap
- Louisiana’s Anti-Vegan Law Constitutionally Enjoined–Tofurky v. Strain
- Instagram Embedding Cases Continue to Vex the Courts–McGucken v. Newsweek
March 2022
- Second Circuit Confirms Fair Use on Motion to Dismiss–Yang v. Mic
- Section 230 Preempts Game User’s Lawsuit Over Game Moderators’ Behavior–Quinteros v. Forge of Empires
- Texas and Its Amici Try to Justify Censorship in Their NetChoice v. Paxton Fifth Circuit Briefs
- When Are Sexually-Themed Memes “Harmful to Minors”?–State v. Chapman
- Vimeo Wins Section 230(c)(2)(A) Ruling on Motion to Dismiss–Daystar v. Vimeo
- If a Lawyer Accepts a TOS While Investigating a Claim, Does It Bind the Client to Arbitration?
- Wouldn’t It Be Great if Internet Services Had To License Technologies Selected by Hollywood? (Comments on the Very Dumb “SMART Copyright Act”)
- YouTube Defeats Copyright Lawsuit For Not Removing Users’ Videos Quickly Enough–Business Casual v. YouTube
- Section 230 Survives Yet Another Constitutional Challenge–Huber v. Biden
- Database Access After Failed Negotiations Didn’t Violate the CFAA–Carfax v. Accu-Trade
- Instagram Influencer Denied Section 230 For Reposting Reader Submissions–Zuckerbrot v. Gellis
- Snapchat May Have a Duty Not to Design Dangerous Software–Maynard v. Snap
- California Courts Continue to Trim Section 230’s Protection for Amazon’s Marketplace (and Everyone Else)–Lee v. Amazon
- Court Mistakenly Thinks Copyright Owners Have a Duty to Police Infringement–Sunny Factory v. Chen
- The CFAA “Gates-Up-or-Down” Metaphor Is Baffling Courts–ACI v. Conservice (Guest Blog Post)
- Court Dismisses Trademark Claims Over Internal Search Results–Las Vegas Skydiving v. Groupon
- First Circuit Says Mirroring Qualifies for Section 230–Monsarrat v. Newman
- Departing Employees Rename Their Former Employers’ Facebook Account. That May Be a Problem–La Baguette v. Tito & Tita
- Justice Thomas Really, REALLY Wants Section 230 Repealed (Even If He Has to Do It Himself)
- 26 Trademark Academics Oppose the SHOP SAFE Act
- U.S. Supreme Court Fixes Ninth Circuit’s Test for Mistakes in Copyright Registrations—Unicolors v. H&M (Guest Blog Post)
- Another 512(f) Claim Fails–Moonbug v. Babybus
- Section 230 Doesn’t Apply to Publication of Private Emails–Crowley v. Faison
- Trademark Registration of Political Messages for Expressive Merchandise–In re Elster (Guest Blog Post)
- Fair Use Protects High School’s Use of Inspirational Meme–Bell v. Eagle Mountain School District
- Copyright Office Rejects Registration for AI-Created Works
- Section 230 Immunizes TikTok for User-Posted Videos–Day v. TikTok
February 2022
- Airline Sues to Stop Popular Web-Scraping Service–American Airlines v. The Points Guy (Guest Blog Post)
- How Fair Use Helps Bloggers Publish Their Research (Cross-Post)
- A Glimmer of Hope That the Copyright Claims Board (CCB) Won’t Turn Into a Troll Factory
- Section 230 Protects Google for Including Telegram In Its App Store–Ginsberg v. Google
- So Many Unanswered Empirical Questions About FOSTA
- Apple Defeats Copyright Lawsuit Over Emoji Depictions–Cub Club v. Apple
- Georgia Supreme Court Blesses Google’s Keyword Ad Sales–Edible IP v. Google
- Another Problematic FOSTA Ruling–Doe v. Pornhub
- California Appellate Court Rejects Poorly Executed “Sign-In Wrap”–Sellers v. JustAnswer (Guest Blog Post)
- Constituents Can Sue Chicago Alderman for Blocking Their Facebook Comments–Czosnyka v. Gardiner
- Another Court Says Facebook Isn’t a State Actor–McWaters v. Houston
- LifeLock Identity Theft Protection Policy May Cover Theft of Cryptocurrency Assets–Atwal v. LifeLock
- A Twitter Thread on the EARN IT Act
- Police Department Can Remove Citizen’s Facebook Comments Calling Cops “Pigs”–Sgaggio v. De Young
- Another Anti-Vaxxer Jawboning Lawsuit Fails–ICAN v. YouTube
January 2022
- 2021 Section 230 Year-in-Review
- Another Confused Entry in the Social Media Account Ownership Jurisprudence–JLM v. Gutman
- Uber’s TOS Fails in Court (Again)–Sarchi v. Uber
- 2021 Internet Law Year-in-Review
- DC Circuit Confirms That Congressional Jawboning Isn’t Actionable–AAPS v. Schiff
- Court Quashes 512(h) Subpoena Submitted to YouTube–Watch Tower v. Kevin McFree
- New Article: “The Constitutionality of Mandating Editorial Transparency”
- Catching Up on Recent FOSTA Developments (None of Them Good)
- The First Amendment Protects Twitter’s Fact-Checking and Account Suspension Decisions–O’Handley v. Padilla
- Section 230 Preempts Claims Against Omegle–M.H. v. Omegle
- Court Denies Class Certification in Click Fraud Case–Singh v. Google
- 2021 Emoji Law Year-in-Review
- Background Reports Protected by Section 230–Dennis v. MyLife
2021 220
December 2021
- Twitter Can’t Quash a 512(h) Subpoena
- Catching Up on the 11th Circuit Appeal in NetChoice v. Moody Over Florida’s Social Media Censorship Law
- Retweets Didn’t Reset Defamation Statute of Limitations–Crosswhite v. Reuters
- Fifth Circuit Issues an Important Online Jurisdiction Ruling–Johnson v. HuffPost
- Recipes Aren’t Copyrightable, No Matter How “Exciting” They Are–Coscarelli v. Esquared
- Competitive Keyword Advertising Claim Fails–Reflex Media v. Luxy
- Antitrust Law Doesn’t Prevent Apple From Rejecting Apps From Its App Store–Coronavirus Reporter v. Apple
- New York Court Is the Wrong Venue for UK GDPR Class Action–Finch v. Xandr
- Airbnb Uses Section 230 to Defeat a Personal Injury Claim–Smith v. Airbnb
- A 512(f) Plaintiff Wins at Trial! 👀–Alper Automotive v. Day to Day Imports
- Armslist Loses Two Section 230 Rulings, But Still Defeats Both Lawsuits
- Yearbook Defendants Lose Two More Section 230 Rulings
- The U.S. Department of Justice Defends Section 230’s Constitutionality
- Court Enjoins Texas’ Attempt to Censor Social Media, and the Opinion Is a Major Development in Internet Law–NetChoice v. Paxton
November 2021
- Catching Up on NetChoice v. Paxton, the Challenge to Texas’ Social Media Censorship Law
- Comments on the Copyright Office’s Copyright Claims Board Rulemaking
- Evidentiary Issues With Emojis
- City Government Can’t Remove Off-Topic Comments From Its Social Media Page–Kimsey v. Sammamish
- One More Time: Facebook Isn’t a State Actor–Atkinson v. Facebook
- Section 230 Helps Facebook and TikTok Defeat Claim Over Harassment Campaign–Winter v. Facebook
- All of Trump’s Social Media Lawsuits Now Have Been Transferred to the Defendants’ Home Courts–Trump v. Facebook
- Are Individual Emoji Depictions Copyrightable? Yes…Well, Sometimes…It Depends…
- Two More Courts Tell Litigants That Social Media Services Aren’t State Actors
- Comments on HB 5502, the “INFORM” Act
- My California Senate Judiciary Committee Testimony on Section 230 and State Regulation
- Another Online Account Termination Case Fails–King v. Facebook
- Talk Notes on the Constitutionality of Transparency Requirements for Internet Services
- BBB Defeats Defamation Lawsuit (After 7 Years)–Better Way v. BBB
- Previewing the “Lessons from the First Internet Ages” Symposium
October 2021
- Eighth Circuit Says a Browsewrap Might Form a Contract (and It Wasn’t Even a “Browsewrap”)–Foster v. Walmart
- Lawsuit Still Goes to Arbitration, Even Though Amazon Has Since Removed Its Arbitration Clause–Nicosia v. Amazon
- Privacy Lawsuit Based on Website Tracking by Service Provider Trimmed
- Trump’s Must-Carry Lawsuit Against Twitter Moved to Twitter’s Home Court–Trump v. Twitter
- Court Orders Unmasking Subpoena of Alleged Infringers–Baugher v. GoDaddy
- Peloton Can’t Bind All Family Members To Its Arbitration Provision–SS v. Peloton
- Social Media Is Often a Defamation-Free Zone…But Not Always–Steak N Shake v. White
- Government Jawboning Doesn’t Turn Internet Services into State Actors–Doe v. Google
- Anti-Zionist Loses Lawsuit Over Social Media Account Suspensions–Martillo v. Facebook
- If “Trespass to Chattels” Isn’t Limited to “Chattels,” Anarchy Ensues–Best Carpet Values v. Google
- There Is No Bottom When It Comes to Section 230 Reform Proposals (Comments on the Justice Against Malicious Algorithms Act)
- Section 230 Protects Securities Exchange–Saveene v. Remo
- Announcing A Major Virtual Event, “Lessons from the First Internet Ages,” on Nov. 2-3, 2021
- Eleventh Circuit Rejects “Material Support for Terrorists” Case–Colon v. Twitter
- TOS Supports Injunction Against Web Scraping–Southwest Airlines v. Kiwi
- Cloudflare Isn’t Liable for Providing Services to Alleged Infringers–Mon Cheri Bridals v. Cloudflare
- Trump Has to Litigate His Must-Carry Lawsuit in YouTube’s Home Court–Trump v. YouTube
- The Legal Implications of Datacenter Location (Guest Blog Post)
- Does the First Amendment Permit Government Actors to Manage Social Media Comments?–Tanner v. Ziegenhorn
September 2021
- The SHOP SAFE Act Is a Terrible Bill That Will Eliminate Online Marketplaces
- For the Third Time, a Second Circuit Panel Dismisses an Online Account Termination Case–Domen v. Vimeo
- Yearbook Database Cases Are Vexing the Courts–Sessa v. Ancestry
- Law Enforcement’s Efforts to Scrub COVID “Misinformation” Online Violated the First Amendment–Cohoon v. Konrath
- Third Circuit Says Section 230 Doesn’t Apply to Publicity Rights Claims–Hepp v. Facebook
- What I Did Last “Summer” (2021)
- Texas Enacts Social Media Censorship Law to Benefit Anti-Vaxxers & Spammers
- My Declaration Identifying Emoji Co. GmbH as a Possible Trademark Troll
- Florida and Its Amici Try to Justify Government Censorship in the 11th Circuit–NetChoice v. Moody
- Instagram Defeats Copyright Claim Over Its Embedding Feature–Hunley v. Instagram
- A Roundup of German Caselaw Regarding Emojis and Emoticons (Guest Blog Post)
- Think Keyword Metatags Are Dead? They Are (Except in Court)–Reflex v. Luxy
- To No One’s Surprise, FOSTA Is Confounding Judges–J.B. v. G6
- The ADA Doesn’t Apply to Online Newspaper Website (Again)–Winegard v. Newsday
- Australian High Court Says Facebook Accountholders “Publish” Third-Party Defamatory Comments–Fairfax Media v. Voller
- FOSTA Claim Can Proceed Against Twitter–Doe v. Twitter
- As Expected, Malwarebytes Defeats Enigma’s Lawsuit Without Section 230’s Help
- Online ‘Diatribe’ Over a Birthday Cake Isn’t Protected by Anti-SLAPP Law–Woodhill Ventures v. Yang
- Twitter’s Content Moderation Explanations Aren’t Defamatory Per Se–Isaac v. Twitter
- Court Casts Doubt on the Legality of the Data Brokerage Industry–Brooks v. Thomson Reuters
August 2021
- When is it Fair Use to Use a Photo to “Illustrate” an Article?
- A Seismic Ruling Undone: California’s Sound Recording Copyright Statute Does Not Include Public Performance Rights—Flo & Eddie v. Sirius XM (Guest Blog Post)
- Cable News Shows Are Defamation-Free Zones–OANN v. Maddow
- Facebook Defeats Lawsuit Over Discriminatory Housing Ads–Vargas v. Facebook
- Court Nopes Another Lawsuit Over Facebook Suspensions–Orders v. Facebook
- Section 230 Doesn’t Protect Yearbook Website’s Ads–Knapke v. Classmates
- New Primer on the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA)
- Fifth Circuit Says Keyword Ads Could Contribute to Initial Interest Confusion (UGH)–Adler v. McNeil
- CCPA Definitions Confuse the Judge in a Data Breach Case–In re Blackbaud
- Judge Rakoff: Embedding Social Media Content is a “Display” Under the Copyright Act
- Emoji Version Variations Help Identify Fabricated Evidence–Rossbach v. Montefiore Medical
- Satirical Depiction in YouTube Video Gets Rough Treatment in Court
- An Initial Look at Washington’s New Anti-SLAPP Statute
- Announcing the 2021 Edition of My Internet Law Casebook
July 2021
- Instacart’s Privacy Policy Protects Stripe from Consumer Privacy Claims–Silver v. Stripe
- Interview About Section 230 and COVID Misinformation
- Blogger Defeats Defamation Claims–Buckley v. Moore
- A Summary of the Copyright Claims Board (CCB) [Excerpt from my Internet Law casebook]
- Google’s Search Disambiguation Doesn’t Create Initial Interest Confusion–Aliign v. lululemon
- Conservative’s Lawsuit Over Google Deindexing Fails–DJ Lincoln v. Google
- Second Circuit Rejects an Account Termination Lawsuit…Again (Phew!)–Domen v. Vimeo
- New Essay: “Five Things to Know About Section 230”
- DC Circuit Upholds Airbnb’s TOS–Selden v. Airbnb
- Grokking the Supreme Court’s TransUnion Decision
- ADA Doesn’t Apply to Newspaper’s Website–Suris v. Gannett
- 1H 2021 Quick Links, Part 4 (Advertising, Contracts, & More)
- Trump Defeats Lawsuit Over Manipulated Viral Video He Tweeted–Cisneros v. Cook
- ‘365 for Business’ Users’ Privacy Lawsuit Dismissed–Russo v. Microsoft
- Comments on Trump’s Lawsuits Against YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter
- 1H 2021 Quick Links, Part 3 (Content Moderation, Censorship, Privacy, & More)
- Demonetized YouTuber Loses Lawsuit–Daniels v. Alphabet
- Should We Adopt a Notice-and-Takedown Scheme for Deepfakes and Other Inauthentic Media?
- Facebook Isn’t Liable for a Commercial Sex Relationship Gone Wrong–A.B. v. Facebook
- 1H 2021 Quick Links, Part 2 (Section 230 and More)
- 1H 2021 Quick Links, Part 1 (IP)
- Comments on Arkansas’ “Online Marketplace Consumer Inform Act” (SB 470)
- Texas Supreme Court Says Amazon Isn’t the Seller of Marketplace Items It Fulfills–Amazon v McMillan
- Facebook Defeats Lawsuit By Publishers of Vaccine (Mis?)information–Children’s Health Defense v. Facebook
- Florida Social Media Censorship Law ENJOINED–NetChoice v. Moody
June 2021
- New Essay: “Regulating Internet Services by Size”
- YouTube Defeats Lawsuit Over Threatening Content–Wells v. YouTube
- Court Rejects Lawsuit Alleging YouTube Engaged in Racially Biased Content Moderation–Newman v. Google
- Amicus Brief in Support of Florida’s Social Media Censorship Law
- Preliminary Injunction Hearing Against Florida’s Social Media Censorship Law
- Yet Another Court Says Facebook Isn’t a State Actor–Brock v. Zuckerberg
- Domino Pizza’s Website Violated the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)–Robles v. Domino’s
- RedBubble Gets Another Favorable Ruling–YZ Productions v. RedBubble
- Plaintiffs Fire Back Against Florida’s Censorship Law–NetChoice v. Moody
- 31 Bogus Passages from Florida’s Defense of Its Censorship Law–NetChoice v. Moody
- School Can’t Discipline Student For Off-Campus Snapchat Messages–Mahanoy School District v. BL
- State Government’s Alleged Copyright Infringement Wasn’t a “Taking”–Jim Olive v. University of Houston (Guest Blog Post)
- Ohio Bans Competitive Keyword Advertising by Lawyers
- Social Media Providers Aren’t Liable for Domestic Mass-Shooting–Retana v. Twitter
- Domain Name Registrar Isn’t Liable for Hijacked Domain Name–Rigsby v. GoDaddy
- Amicus Briefs Against Florida’s Censorship Law (SB 7072)
- Want to Engage in Anti-Competitive Trademark Bullying? Second Circuit Says: Great, Have a Nice Day!–1-800 Contacts v. FTC
- Did Facebook Commit Tortious Interference Against BrandTotal?–Facebook v. BrandTotal
- More Perspectives About Van Buren v. US (Guest Blog Post)
- Print Ad’s “Terms and Conditions” Don’t Create Binding Arbitration Clause–Soliman v. Subway
- Do We Even Need the Computer Fraud & Abuse Act (CFAA)?–Van Buren v. US
- Plaintiffs Request Preliminary Injunction Against Florida’s Censorship Law (SB 7072)–NetChoice v. Moody
- Florida Hits a New Censorial Low in Internet Regulation (Comments on SB 7072)
- New York’s New Post-Mortem Right of Publicity Law Comes Into Effect, Part 2 (Guest Blog Post)
- New York’s New Post-Mortem Right of Publicity Law Comes Into Effect, Part 1 (Guest Blog Post)
May 2021
- YouTuber Doesn’t Qualify as a Member of the “News Media”–Green v. Pierce County
- What Are ‘Red Flags of Infringement’? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ — Capitol v. Vimeo
- Section 230 Preempts Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) Claims–Henderson v. Source for Public Data
- Court Rejects Content Moderators’ Lawsuit Over Traumatic Work–Garrett-Alfred v. Facebook
- What Would Happen If Search Engines Had to Give Higher Visibility to Less Relevant Results?
- Facebook’s “Russia State-Controlled Media” Disclosure Doesn’t Violate the Lanham Act–Maffick v. Facebook
- Eighth Circuit Embraces the Initial Interest Confusion Doctrine. What??? UGH. No. Why???–Select Comfort v. Baxter
- The Ninth Circuit’s Confusing Ruling Over Snapchat’s Speed Filter–Lemmon v. Snap
- Depiction of Michigan as Hands Doesn’t Preclude Similar Depictions–High Five v. MFB
- Comments on the Oversight Board’s Decision Regarding Trump’s Facebook Account
- A Roundup of CCPA Court Decisions (I Only Know of 7)
April 2021
- California Court Holds Amazon Strictly Liable for Marketplace Items Amazon Didn’t Fulfill–Loomis v. Amazon
- Amazon Can’t Force Arbitration of Minors’ Privacy Lawsuit Over Alexa Recordings–BF v. Amazon
- Ninth Circuit Rejects Lawsuit Over Hijacked Facebook Account–Long v. Dorset
- CCPA Data Breach Lawsuit Against Walmart Fails–Gardiner v. Walmart
- Massachusetts Supreme Court Says Turo Doesn’t Qualify for Section 230…Sometimes…–Massport v. Turo
- Broadcaster Fails to Enjoin YouTube–Kifle v. YouTube
- 11th Circuit Says Grocery Store Website Isn’t Covered by the ADA–Gil v. Winn-Dixie
- YouTube (Again) Defeats Lawsuit Over Content Removal–Lewis v. Google
- When It Came to @RealDonaldTrump, Twitter Couldn’t Please Everyone–Rutenberg v. Twitter
- Internet Feuds Are Basically Defamation-Free Warzones–Rapaport v. Barstool
- Deconstructing Justice Thomas’ Pro-Censorship Statement in Knight First Amendment v. Trump
- 512(f) Preempts Tortious Interference Claim–Copy Me That v. This Old Gal
- There Are Multiple Types of “Clickwrap.” They Should All Be Enforceable–Calderon v. Sixt
- U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Fair Use in Google-Oracle Software Battle (Guest Blog Post)
- Section 230 Preempts Contract Breach Claims–Morton v. Twitter
- Another Must-Carry Lawsuit Against YouTube Fails–Daniels v Alphabet
- Udemy Qualifies for 512(c) Safe Harbor for User-Uploaded Courses–Kinsley v. Udemy
March 2021
- Snapchat Photos Don’t Constitute “Virtual” Physical Presence–People v. White
- Facebook Defeats Lawsuit Over Alleged ‘Shadowbanning’–De Souza Millan v. Facebook
- Blogger Loses Copyright Ruling Over Photo…But No Mention of the CC-BY-SA License!–Von Der Au v. Imber
- New Article: “Content Moderation Remedies”
- State Legislator Doesn’t Understand That He Works for the Government–Attwood v. Clemons
- Star Rating at Google Review Isn’t Defamatory–Gursten v. Doe 1
- Newspaper Isn’t State Actor–Plotkin v. Astorian
- Section 230 (Mostly) Protects Zoom from Liability for Zoombombing
- Consent Via “Clickwrap” Defeats Privacy Claims–Javier v. Assurance
- Blogger’s Photo Republication Isn’t Fair Use–Golden v. Grecco
- Pinterest Defeats Contributory Copyright Infringement Claim–Davis v. Pinterest
- Important Second Circuit Opinion Says Section 230(c)(2)(A) Protects Online Account Terminations–Domen v. Vimeo
- Comments on the PROMISE Act
- Catching Up on the Parler v. AWS Dispute
- Social Media Ownership Disputes Part II: Bridal Wear Company Takes Back Control of Instagram Account from Ex-Employee
- More Confirmation That RSS Feeds Aren’t Just “Really Simple Stealing”–MidlevelU v. Newstex
- Social Media Ownership Disputes, Part I: the Satanic Temple of Washington Can’t Get Its Facebook Pages Back
- The Anticipated Domino Effect: Virginia Passes Second State “Comprehensive” Privacy Law (Guest Blog Post)
- New Essay: “The Crisis of Online Contracts (as Told in 10 Memes)”
- Section 230 Covers Republication of Old Yearbooks–Callahan v. Ancestry
February 2021
- TOS Isn’t a Browsewrap or a Clickwrap, But the Judge Upholds It Anyways–Regan v. Pinger
- IP Lawsuits Against Print-on-Demand Vendors Continue to Vex the Courts–OSU v. Redbubble & More
- Data Breach Plaintiff Doesn’t Have Standing in the Absence of Fraud or Identity Theft–Tsao v. Captiva
- Ninth Circuit Sends Alexa Surreptitious Recording Case to Arbitration–Tice v. Amazon
- Roundup of Some Influential 1990s Internet Law Articles
- Doctor Can’t Win Default Judgment Over Patient’s Yelp Review–Mirza v. Amar
- Congressional Jawboning of Internet Services Isn’t Actionable–AAPS v. Schiff
- An Account Suspension Case Fails Again–Perez v. LinkedIn
- Section 230 Applies to Articles by Huffington Post Contributors–Page v. Oath
- Section 230 Protects App Store from Liability for Apps With Loot Boxes–Coffee v. Google
- Internet Law Year-in-Review for 2020
- CAN-SPAM Requires Falsity or Deception, But What Do Those Words Mean?–Rad v. US
- When Can Plaintiffs Serve Process Via Online Methods? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- Are Social Media Services “State Actors” or “Common Carriers”?
- Comments on the “SAFE TECH” Act
- How Section 230 Makes My Life Better (A Celebration of Its 25 Year Anniversary)
- TripAdvisor Doesn’t Get Early Section 230 Dismissal–Putt v. TripAdvisor
January 2021
- Google and Twitter Defeat Lawsuit Over Account Suspensions/Terminations–DeLima v. Google
- Selling Keyword Ads Isn’t Theft or Conversion–Edible IP v. Google
- Continued Access to Service Not Sufficient to Bind User to New Terms of Service–Stover v. Experian
- Politician Can Block Constituents at Twitter–If It’s a “Campaign” Account–Campbell v. Reisch
- FOSTA Survives Constitutional Challenge–US v. Martono
- CASE-ing the Joint: The Copyright Alternative in Small-Claims Enforcement Act (Guest Blog Post)
- Planning to Sue Twitter Over an Account Suspension? YOU WILL LOSE–Murphy v. Twitter
- Mirroring Qualifies for Section 230–Monsarrat v. Newman
- Lawyer Can’t Sue Google for Bad Client Review–Lewis v. Google
- Court Rejects Parler’s Demand That Amazon Host Its Services
- Comments on the “Protecting Constitutional Rights from Online Platform Censorship Act”
- Emoji Law Year-in-Review for 2020
- A Short Summary of the CASE Act (Guest Blog Post)
- When Can a Politician Block Constituents on Social Media?–Garnier v. O’Connor-Ratcliff
- Facebook Isn’t Liable for Account Hack/Hijack–Damner v. Facebook
- Section 230 Year-in-Review for 2020
- New Op-Ed: People Who Understand Section 230 Actually Love It
- 2H 2020 Quick Links, Part 5 (Contracts, E-Commerce, Defamation, Censorship, & More)
- More Plaintiffs (and Lawyers) Need To Be Reminded That YouTube Isn’t a State Actor–Divino v. Google
- A New CJEU Judgment on Copyright-Related Geoblocking – One Step Forward or One Step Back in the EU Commission’s Fight Against Geoblocking? (Guest Blog Post)
- FTC’s Confusing Guidance on How Merchants Should Manage Their Consumer Reviews
- Laura Loomer Loses Another Lawsuit Related to Her Twitter Ban–Illoominate v. CAIR
- 2H 2020 Quick Links, Part 4 (FOSTA)
2020 205
December 2020
- 2H 2020 Quick Links, Part 3 (Trademarks)
- Facebook Isn’t a Constructive Public Trust–Cameron Atkinson v. Facebook
- 2H 2020 Quick Links, Part 2 (Section 230)
- 2H 2020 Quick Links, Part 1 (Copyright)
- Ninth Circuit Says Amazon Isn’t “Seller” of Marketplace Items–State Farm v. Amazon
- Google Isn’t Liable for Allegedly Problematic Search Results–Diez v. Google
- Domain Name Lawsuits Are Stupid (and the Initial Interest Confusion Doctrine Is Too)–Wooster Floral v. Green Thumb
- Jury Will Decide If Videogame Character Infringes a Wrestling Persona–GI Bro v. Call of Duty
- CDT Lacks Standing to Challenge Trump’s Anti-230 Executive Order
- Fair Use Permits Newspaper to Republish Photo Taken By Drone–Castle v. Kingsport Publishing
- Can Influencers’ Failure to Disclose Sponsorship Constitute False Advertising?–EIS v. WOW Tech (Guest Blog Post)
- A Rare Case of a Judge Relying on the Initial Interest Confusion Doctrine (Boo)–Nike v. Warren Lotas
- Justice Thomas’ Anti-Section 230 Statement Doesn’t Support Reconsideration–JB v. Craigslist
- Op-Ed: Social Media Companies Should Permanently Ban Political Advertising
- CRM Software Vendor Didn’t Qualify for Section 230–Tan v. Konnektive
- Court Again Enjoins Anti-TikTok Executive Order–TikTok v. US
- Another Court Says Embedding Instagram Photos May Be Fair Use–Boesen v. United Sports
- Section 230 Protects Amazon from Manufacturer’s Ad Copy–Brodie v. Amazon
- It’s Meshugenah to Operate a Streaming Mixtape Site–Atlantic v. Spinrilla
- Google and YouTube Aren’t “Censoring” Breitbart Comments–Belknap v. Alphabet
- New Ebook on Zeran v. AOL, the Most Important Section 230 Case (Techdirt Cross-Post)
November 2020
- 512(f) Claim Against Robo-Notice Sender Can Proceed–Enttech v. Okularity
- YouTube Defeats Lawsuit Over Cryptocurrency Scam–Ripple v. YouTube
- Who Owns Vacation Photos of You? Probably Not You–Hubay v. Mendez
- Court Sends Wyze Labs Privacy Suit to Arbitration
- Facebook Can Block Scraper (For Now)–Facebook v. BrandTotal
- The Case Against Holding Amazon Liable for Third-Party Merchants’ Sales in its Marketplace (WSJ Cross-Post)
- Court Upholds Gaming App’s Clickthrough TOS–Ball v. Skillz
- My California Young Lawyers Association Interview About Emojis
- Copyright Plaintiffs Can’t Figure Out What Copyrights They Own, Court Says ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- If You Want an Enforceable Online Contract, You Better Keep a Good Chain of Evidence–Snow v. Eventbrite
- QAnon Conspiracy Theorists Can’t Force YouTube to Carry Their Videos–Doe v. Google
- Another Court Rejects Trump’s Censorial Anti-TikTok EO–Marland v. Trump
October 2020
- Snapchat Isn’t Liable for Its Speed Filter (Even if Section 230 Doesn’t Apply)–Maynard v. Snapchat
- Constitutional Challenge to Trump’s Anti-230 EO Fails–Rock the Vote v. Trump
- A 512(f) Case Leads to a Rare Damages Award (on a Default Judgment)–California Beach v. Du
- We’re Still Unsure If Instagram Grants Users a Sublicense to Embed Photos
- Yet Another Twitter Account Suspension Case Fails–Jones v. Twitter
- A Little Good News: SSRN Has Launched a New eJournal on Advertising & Marketing Law
- Justice Thomas Writes a Misguided Anti-Section 230 Statement “Without the Benefit of Briefing”–Enigma v. Malwarebytes
- Another Tough Ruling for Print-on-Demand Vendors–Sid Avery v. Pixels
- One Minute Spent Reviewing a Junk Fax Received via Email is Not Injury for Article III Purposes
- SF Chronicle Op-Ed: “Prop. 24 is the Wrong Policy Approach, at the Wrong Time, via the Wrong Process”
- LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. LinkedIn
- Facebook Doesn’t Have a Duty to Prevent a Murder–Godwin v. Facebook
- Twitter Wins Another Account Suspension Case–Wilson v. Twitter
- hiQ Labs v. LinkedIn Corp., the Web Scraping Saga Continues (Guest Blog Post)
- 512(f) Claim Survives Motion to Dismiss–Brandyn Love v. Nuclear Blast America
- Over 50 Privacy Professionals & Experts Oppose Prop. 24
- What Does the Legislature Have to Show for Its CCPA Amendments in 2020? Not Much (Guest Blog Post)
- Section 230 Preempts Another Facebook Account Termination Case–Zimmerman v. Facebook
- Copyright Owner Claims Ownership Over Depicting Emoji Symbols in Multiple Colors–Cub Club v. Apple
- Depicting Randy Orton’s Tattoos in a Video Game Could Be Copyright Infringement–Alexander v. WWE 2K
September 2020
- Sen. Graham Cares More About Trolls Than Section 230 (Comments on Online Content Policy Modernization Act)
- Court Enjoins Trump Administration’s Attempt to Kick TikTok Out of App Stores–TikTok v. Trump
- WeChat Executive Order Enjoined Because (Of Course) It’s Unconstitutional–WeChat Users v. Trump
- Twitter Isn’t Liable for Defamatory Impersonation Account–Brikman v. Twitter
- Facial Recognition Database Vendor May Not Qualify for Section 230–Vermont v. Clearview
- Californians: VOTE NO ON PROP. 24, The California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA)
- My Testimony in Favor of Updating Utah’s Anti-SLAPP Law
- An Interview on Why Section 230 Is On the “Endangered Watch List”
- A Closer Look at a Troubling Anti-Scraping Ruling from Spring–Compulife Software v. Newman (Guest Blog Post)
- Sex Trafficking Lawsuit Against Craigslist Moves Forward–ML v. Craigslist
- This Copyright Fair Use Opinion Discusses Jon Hamm’s Crotch 25 Times–Schwartzwald v. Oath
- Amazon Is Strictly Liable for Marketplace Items, Reinforcing That Online Marketplaces Are Doomed–Bolger v. Amazon
- Twibel Lawsuit Fails–Ganske v. Mensch
- 512(f) Claim Fails in the 11th Circuit–Johnson v. New Destiny Christian Center
- Court Denies TRO Seeking to Remove Facebook’s “Russia State-Controlled Media” Label–Maffick v. Facebook
- Competitive Keyword Advertising Still Isn’t Trademark Infringement, Unless…. –Adler v. Reyes & Adler v. McNeil
- Another Roundup of Online Contract Formation Cases
- Section 230 Preempts Another FOSTA Claim–Doe v. Kik
August 2020
- The First Amendment Protects the Marketing Term “Vegan Butter”–Miyoko’s v. Ross
- Infringing Polish Website Isn’t Subject to Personal Jurisdiction in the United States–AMA v. Wanat
- Want to Write a Story About Tardigrades in Space? Make It So!–Abdin v. CBS
- Australian Court Says Using a Zipper-Mouth Emoji Can Be Defamatory–Burrows v. Houda
- Want to Know What I Did This Summer? A Roundup of My Projects During the Pandemic Summer
- Section 230 Protects Craigslist from Sex Trafficking Claims, Despite FOSTA–JB v. Craigslist
- How I’m Teaching My “Internet Law” Course Online
- Court Orders Rightsowner to Withdraw DMCA Takedown Notices Sent to Amazon–Beyond Blond v. Heldman
- Message Board Operator Isn’t Liable for Third-Party Posts (DUH)–East Coast Test Prep v. Allnurses
- Three Keyword Advertising Decisions in a Week, and the Trademark Owners Lost Them All
- Google Defeats Account Termination Case on Section 230 Grounds (Mostly)–Enhanced Athlete v. YouTube
- Comments on NTIA’s Petition to the FCC Seeking to Destroy Section 230
- Announcing the Fifth Edition of Advertising & Marketing Law: Cases & Materials by Tushnet & Goldman
- A Second Circuit Panel Misunderstands the Copyright Act’s Statute of Limitations (Guest Blog Post)
- The EARN IT Act Has Gotten Even More Terrible. So Of Course It’s Moving Forward
- IAP Defeats Vicarious Copyright Infringement Claim–UMG v. Bright House
- While Our Country Is Engulfed By Urgent Must-Solve Problems, Congress Is Working Hard to Burn Down Section 230
- Comments on the Internet Association’s Empirical Study of Section 230 Cases
- Data Center Avoids Copyright Liability By Forwarding DMCA Notices to Its Customer–ALS Scan v. Steadfast
July 2020
- Plaintiff Can’t Use Trump’s Anti-Section 230 EO to Sue Facebook–Gomez v. Zuckenburg
- Section 230 Doesn’t Protect Repeating Rumors–La Liberte v. Reid
- Geotagged Social Media Posts Didn’t Support Personal Jurisdiction–Court of Master Sommeliers v. Pilkey
- Comments on the “Platform Accountability and Consumer Transparency Act” (the “PACT Act”)
- Repeated Amazon Purchases Sufficient to Impute Notice of Arbitration Clause
- Instagram User’s Lawsuit Over Terminated Account Gets Revived (But Not For Long)–Teatotaller v. Facebook
- Print-on-Demand Vendor Doesn’t Qualify for DMCA Safe Harbor–Feingold v. RageOn
- Local Craigslist Ads Are Part of Interstate Commerce–US v. Luong
- Why Are Pizzerias Arguing Whether Web Browsing Is Copyright Infringement?–Imapizza v. At Pizza
- Announcing the 2020 Edition of My Internet Law Casebook
- Is It OK to Embed Instagram Photos? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- Q2 2020 Quick Links (Everything)
- Court Can’t Compel Twitter to Shut Down Trump’s Account
- Emojis Keep Teen Out of Jail–State v. DRC
- Trump’s Twitter Tantrums Are Affecting How Judges Evaluate Online Discourse–US v. Cook
- California’s Effort to Suppress the Publication of Age Information Violates the Constitution–IMDb v. Becerra
- Unhappy Google Advertiser’s Lawsuit Completely Falls Apart–Dreamstime v. Google
- “Shitty Media Men” List Operator Doesn’t Qualify for Section 230 (Yet)–Elliott v. Donegan
- Want to Learn More About Section 230? A Guide to My Work (UPDATED)
June 2020
- Supreme Court Promotes Weaponization of Generic Domain Names–USPTO v. Booking.com
- A Review of the “Final” CCPA Regulations from the CA Attorney General
- My Interview With Mathew Ingram Regarding Section 230
- Running Geotargeted Advertising Confers Personal Jurisdiction–UMG Recordings v. Kurbanov
- Court Upholds Formation of a Lengthy Contract Presented on a Mobile Device–Hidalgo v. AAU
- Section 230 Protects Twitter from the “Devin Nunes’ Cow” Lawsuit–Nunes v. Twitter
- Another Court Rejects Turo’s Eligibility for Section 230–Turo v. Los Angeles
- Reviewing the Americans With Disabilities Act’s Application to Websites–Martinez v. SDCCU
- President Trump Loves Section 230 for Himself, Just Not for Anyone Else (Guest Blog Post)
- “There’s Always a Tweet” Applies to Trump’s Anti-Social Media Rhetoric (Guest Blog Post)
- Americans Would Probably Love Section 230—If They Understood It (Cross-Post)
- A Pre-History of the Trust & Safety Professional Association (TSPA)
- The CCPA Proposed Regs’ Data Valuation Calculation Provisions Provide Flexibility, But Raise Ambiguity & Transparency Concerns
- Cybersecurity Experts Support Supreme Court Review of Enigma v. Malwarebytes Ruling on Section 230(c)(2)(B)
- Per Section 230, Facebook Can Tell This Plaintiff To Piss Off–Fyk v. Facebook
- Fortnite Defeats Another Lawsuit Over Emote Dance Moves–Brantley v. Epic Games
- Brokerage Account Formation Process Upheld–Valelly v. Merrill Lynch
- What is a “True Threat” Online?–In re. R.D.
- Fox News Is a Flaming Pile of Garbage, But You Can’t Sue Them for That–WASHLITE v. Fox News
- My Galley by CJR Interview on Trump’s Anti-Section 230 Executive Order
- Section 230 Applies to Publicity Rights Claim–Hepp v. Facebook
- Section 230 Ends Demonetized YouTuber’s Lawsuit–Lewis v. Google
- Court Rejects Another Lawsuit Alleging that Internet Companies Suppress Conservative Views–Freedom Watch v. Google
May 2020
- Trump’s “Preventing Online Censorship” Executive Order Is Pro-Censorship Political Theater
- Court Sends Google Assistant Privacy Lawsuit Back for a Redo
- High School Can’t Expel Student for Sharing Memes in Private Snapchat Conversation–JS v. Manheim Township School District
- Fair Use Protects a Highly Cropped Photo–Harbus v. Manhattan Institute
- Armslist Wins Another Section 230 Ruling–Stokinger v. Armslist
- A Sure Way to Ruin My Day: The Phrase “Enforceable Browsewrap”–HealthplanCRM v. Avmed
- Another Suspended Twitter User Loses in Court–Wilson v. Twitter
- 2H 2019 and Q1 2020 Quick Links, Part 7 (Content Moderation, Censorship, Defamation, & More)
- Another 512(f) Claim Fails–Ningbo Mizhihe v Doe
- 2H 2019 and Q1 2020 Quick Links, Part 6 (Pornography/CSAM)
April 2020
- Facebook Still Can’t Dismiss Sex Trafficking Victims’ Lawsuit in Texas State Court
- Section 230 Protects Hyperlinks in #MeToo “Whisper Network”–Comyack v. Giannella
- 2H 2019 and Q1 2020 Quick Links, Part 5 (Privacy)
- 2H 2019 and Q1 2020 Quick Links, Part 4 (Section 230)
- Lime’s User Agreement Sends Another Case to Arbitration–Babcock v. Neutron
- Craigslist Denied Section 230 Immunity for Classified Ads from 2008–ML v. Craigslist
- Ninth Circuit Reinstates Decade-Old Lawsuit Against Facebook For Tracking Logged-Out Users–In re Facebook Internet Tracking
- Section 230 Doesn’t Protect Advertising “Background Reports” on People–Lukis v. Whitepages
- 2H 2019 and Q1 2020 Quick Links, Part 3 (FOSTA/Backpage)
- 2H 2019 and Q1 2020 Quick Links, Part 2 (Trademarks/Keywords)
- 2H 2019 and Q1 2020 Quick Links, Part 1 (Copyright, E-Commerce, Advertising)
- Another Terrible Copyright Ruling on IAPs’ Liability for Users’ File-Sharing–Warner v. Charter
- TheDirty Easily Defeats Another Defamation Lawsuit–Laake v. Dirty World
- Instagram’s TOS Authorizes Third-Party Embedding of Photos–Sinclair v. Mashable
- Another Court Significantly Limits the Scope of Criminal CFAA–Sandvig v. Barr
- U.S. Supreme Court Confirms that States Have Sovereign Immunity from Copyright Infringement Suits–Allen v. Cooper
- Judge Isn’t Impressed By Lawyer’s Purported Unfamiliarity With LinkedIn–Reyes v. Tanaka
- Humvee Can’t Stop Depictions of Its Vehicles in the ‘Call of Duty’ Videogame–AM General v. Activision Blizzard
- Ninth Circuit Rallies in Defense of a Parody Dog Toy–Bad Spaniels v. Jack Daniel’s
- Videogame Can Replicate Musician’s “Signature Move” (Unless It’s a False Endorsement, Which It Isn’t)–Pellegrino v. Epic Games
March 2020
- Videogame Doesn’t Infringe Tattoo Copyright By Depicting Basketball Players–Solid Oak Sketches v. 2K Games
- Section 230 Protects Classifying Non-Competitive Software as a Threat–Asurvio v. Malwarebytes
- Redbox’s Terms of Use Fail (OUCH)–Wilson v. Redbox
- “Material Support for Terrorism” Lawsuit Fails a Third Time–Colon v. Twitter
- My Third Set of Comments to the CA DOJ on the CCPA Regulations
- Newspaper Can Talk About “Derby Pies” Without Infringing Trademarks–Rupp v. Courier Journal
- YouTuber Loses Lawsuit Over Channel Termination–Mishiyev v. Alphabet
- Another Troubling Courtroom Loss for Online Marketplaces–Massachusetts Port Authority v. Turo
- Recap of the USDOJ’s Section 230 Roundtable
- The EARN IT Act Partially Repeals Section 230, But It Won’t Help Children
- 46 Academics Encourage Congress To Consider Section 230’s Benefits
- Radio Hosts Aren’t Liable for Online Attacks Against Beleaguered Referee–Higgins v. Kentucky Sports Radio
- First Voters Reject Tulsi Gabbard, Then a Judge Does–Gabbard v. Google
- Santa Clara Law’s Privacy Law Program Receives Substantial Gifts…AND COME WORK WITH ME!
- Snapchat’s Speed Filter Protected by Section 230–Lemmon v. Snap
- Defendants Keep Getting Arbitration Despite the Anarchy in Online Contract Formation Doctrine
- YouTube Isn’t a State Actor (DUH)–PragerU v. Google
- Yelp Finally Defeats a False Advertising Lawsuit Over Its Review Functionality–Demetriades v. Yelp
February 2020
- Comments on the DOJ’s Proposed Modifications to the CCPA Regulations
- Section 230 Protects Zillow for Bogus Submissions of House Details–924 Bel Air v. Zillow
- Yelp Defeats Businesses’ “Right to Be Forgotten” Claims—Spiegelman v. Yelp
- The “EARN IT” Act Is Another Terrible Proposal to “Reform” Section 230
- Top Moments from #WIPIP2020
- Snapchat Temporarily Defeats Another Case Over Its Speed Filter–Lemmon v. Snap
- New Paper Explains How FOSTA Devastated Male Sex Workers
- Can a Retweet Constitute Copyright Infringement? Uh….–Bell v. Chicago Cubs
- Video Excerpts Qualify as Fair Use (and Another 512(f) Claim Fails)–Hughes v. Benjamin
- Google Search Qualifies For Section 230, Whether or Not It’s a “Platform”–Chukwurah v. Google
- Can a “Fire” Emoji Support a Manslaughter Conviction?–Johnson v. State
- Nextdoor Post Isn’t Protected by Anti-SLAPP Law–Jeppson v. Ley
January 2020
- Santa Clara Law Is Hiring a Privacy Law Fellow for 2020-21
- FOSTA Constitutional Challenge Revived–Woodhull Freedom Foundation v. US
- 2019 Emoji Law Year-in-Review
- Facebook Still Isn’t Obligated to Publish Russian Troll Content–FAN v. Facebook
- A Blog’s RSS Feed May Not Grant an Implied Copyright License–MidlevelU v. Newstex
- Vimeo Defeats Lawsuit for Terminating Account That Posted Conversion Therapy Videos–Domen v. Vimeo
- Website Denied Section 230 for No Good Reason, Wins the Case Anyways–DF Pace v. Baker-White
- The Israeli Chipmunk Emoji Mystery Resolved!
- Ninth Circuit Doubles Down on Bad Ruling That Undermines Cybersecurity–Enigma v. Malwarebytes
- Top Internet Law Developments of 2019
- Troublesome Emojis in Criminal Cases (Guest Blog Post)
- Java API Classes as Fictional Characters―A Proposal for Google v. Oracle (Guest Blog Post)
- New Civil FOSTA Lawsuits Push Expansive Legal Theories Against Unexpected Defendants (Guest Blog Post)