Herb Sutter's Blog
- Posts
- 22 from 17 Nov 2003 to 6 Sep 2004
- Posting
- archived, read-only
- Kind
- personal blog
- Feed
- https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/archive/blogs/hsutter/feed.xml
2004 10
- Simulating try/finally in plain C++ (without the C++/CLI extensions)
- Downloading the Express beta compiler
- C++/CLI timeline and one-line description
- finally + destructors = best of both worlds
- An update to the C++/CLI draft
- A new article on C++/CLI
- C++ RAII compared with Java Dispose pattern
- More on % (managed reference)
- Using % and &
- The object lifetime issue is the same in C++, Java, C#
2003 12
- How much C++/CLI syntax do you need to use all of the .NET Frameworks?
- Why not limit GC to CLI types?
- Why "gcnew" instead of just plain "new"?
- C++/CLI keywords: Under the hood
- Why "gcnew T" instead of "new (gc) T"?
- C++/CLI candidate base document now available
- Why R^ instead of cli::handle<R>?
- Why "ref class X", not just "class X : System::Object"?
- Q: Why keywords instead of __keywords? A: We already tried __keywords; they failed.
- Q: Aren't C++ pointers alone enough to "handle" GC? A: No.
- Q: Could the CLI binding become required? A: No.
- Help | About